Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 55,958   Posts: 1,148,850   Online: 1109
      
+ Reply to Thread
Page 51 of 315 FirstFirst ... 414546474849505152535455565761101151 ... LastLast
Results 501 to 510 of 3149
  1. #501

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    957
    Images
    2
    I used it once about 3 years ago, I wasted a lot of it but I did manage to get this.

  2. #502

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5,662
    Quote Originally Posted by accozzaglia View Post
    Leave the thread open.
    As long as it is about Kodachrome.
    But it hasn't been for quite a while now.

    And even then: Kodachrome needs to die for people to start talking about it?
    There's something not quite right...

    The only new content is that it has now gone. We do know that by now.
    The rest wasn't discussed for 74 years, and i don't know why it should now, now that it is too late.

  3. #503
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    19,344
    Images
    65
    Well, 3 Hollywood names passed on this week and it took their demise for APUG members to comment. What else is new?

    PE

  4. #504
    accozzaglia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sweet home Toronto, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    514
    There's this thing called the eulogy. It's how people work through and bargain their loss for something over which (or someone over whom) fondness, familiarity, and steadfastness cannot be replaced.

    There's also this thing about recognizing a good conversation when one materializes on its own.

    This thread has both. I love it. If APUG isn't the most suitable place anywhere to hold such a closure for photographers who used Kodachrome, then where else is?


    [There are also 51,407 other threads on APUG on which being a topic-compliance gestapo could be better utilized.]


    Quote Originally Posted by Q.G. View Post
    As long as it is about Kodachrome.
    But it hasn't been for quite a while now.

    And even then: Kodachrome needs to die for people to start talking about it?
    There's something not quite right...

    The only new content is that it has now gone. We do know that by now.
    The rest wasn't discussed for 74 years, and i don't know why it should now, now that it is too late.
    Last edited by accozzaglia; 06-28-2009 at 05:47 PM.
    Kodachrome Toronto: 1935–2010 supervised research project :: Kodachrome Toronto pool :: @KodachromeTO
    Flickr: my Kodachrome :: DIM :: all of it

    A "show of force": get the "Forever Kodachrome: 1935–2010" camera bag button-pin
    "What was lost in Kodachrome was less about an object — film — and more about what one could create with that medium. Like taking oil from Monet."

  5. #505
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    19,344
    Images
    65
    Astrid;

    I wish I could have said it as well.

    PE

  6. #506

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5,662
    Nobody likes a good eulogy better than me.

    But unions, steel industry, politics, GM ... ?

    If that is not a sign that the eulogy has stopped being a eulogy, and that the mourners have already left the funeral and moved on to live the life of the living, forgetting the recently departed, i don't know what is.

    So let's open a thread to discuss union politics and how they might or might not have driven the U.S. economy into the ground. (Preferably somewhere where i cannot stumple upon it accidentally)

    And for here and now, let's remember the thing that is so often heard: rest in peace.
    Let, to borrow from Shakespeare, the rest be silence.

  7. #507
    accozzaglia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sweet home Toronto, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    514
    Well then, you should alert a moderator to kill it.

    If so, I'll alert a moderator to sticky-post this thread and keep it open.
    Kodachrome Toronto: 1935–2010 supervised research project :: Kodachrome Toronto pool :: @KodachromeTO
    Flickr: my Kodachrome :: DIM :: all of it

    A "show of force": get the "Forever Kodachrome: 1935–2010" camera bag button-pin
    "What was lost in Kodachrome was less about an object — film — and more about what one could create with that medium. Like taking oil from Monet."

  8. #508
    clayne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, CA | Kuching, MY | Jakarta, ID
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,775
    Images
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Dinesh View Post
    Apparently with every newly minted Bachelor of Arts degree, you receive a free thesaurus.

    We now return you to your regularly scheduled broadcast.

    http://www.thestar.com/news/insight/article/657803
    Too funny. Apparently the guide to Succinct and Concise Delivery costs extra, however.
    Stop worrying about grain, resolution, sharpness, and everything else that doesn't have a damn thing to do with substance.

    http://www.flickr.com/kediwah

  9. #509
    accozzaglia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sweet home Toronto, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    514
    Quote Originally Posted by clayne View Post
    Apparently the guide to Succinct and Concise Delivery costs extra, however.
    @accozzaglia: Avail 4 sale on Twitter and Facebook, no less. lol.
    Last edited by accozzaglia; 06-28-2009 at 06:48 PM.
    Kodachrome Toronto: 1935–2010 supervised research project :: Kodachrome Toronto pool :: @KodachromeTO
    Flickr: my Kodachrome :: DIM :: all of it

    A "show of force": get the "Forever Kodachrome: 1935–2010" camera bag button-pin
    "What was lost in Kodachrome was less about an object — film — and more about what one could create with that medium. Like taking oil from Monet."

  10. #510

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Welland, Ontario, Canada
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    210
    Quote Originally Posted by Q.G.
    Nobody likes a good eulogy better than me.
    But unions, steel industry, politics, GM ... ? ...
    You missed the point about the reference to GM. It was comparing the corporate mentality at Kodak and GM -- the type of corporate mentality which led to the termination of Kodachrome and Oldsmobile and Pontiac.

    Quote Originally Posted by wogster
    ... GM's main problem is that it's more complex then most governments, there are rules and regulations, and a massive corporate bureaucracy. They decided they could make tons of money selling V8 powered trucks and SUV's, and they did, to the tune of billions of dollars per year, despite the unions. ...
    You and accozzaglia are correct that there are many other problems, but it's no coincidence that the Big Three (who must deal with the UAW/CAW) are all broke while the other car manufacturers who don't deal with that Union are not broke. I don't want to sound like I'm anti-Union because I am not. I support Unions. However, some Unions get greedy to the point they kill the goose that lays their golden eggs. Just look at the current city garbage workers strike in Toronto where they have 18 paid sick days per year which they can accumulate till retirement. Such Union benefits are ridiculous!

    Quote Originally Posted by Photo Engineer
    ... Terry argues financial issues without knowing that film manufacture is far more complex than his rather simple idealistic models encompass. He visualizes a new film or an old one put into production with a snap of the fingers, and a shutdown the same way.
    It ain't so! Film making is on the order of complexity of genetic engineering. ...
    Now Ron,
    I've never talked about making a "new" Film -- just K64 & 25, and I am fully aware that making Film is very "complex". I never suggested it is as easy as a snap of the fingers. I believe that where there's a will there's a way. I am not a defeatist. I am simply an old-fashioned firm believer in customer service and loyalty, and I don't apologize for believing in quality service. I don't subscribe to the Wall Street song of money money money -- money! I prefer service service service -- loyalty! I'm afraid that you often sound like you think Kodak should just quit making Film altogether.

    ... So, a simple financial model of restarting Kodachrome (or indeed any product) does not take into account the difficulty and cost of simply shutting down a coating machine for a weekend, or a missed coating slot due to a fumbled emulsion make that has not been made for a few years and the engineer is out of practice. ...
    I'm sure you're not saying that Kodak makes all of its non-Kodachrome Films throughout all 52 weeks a year. Don't they run off those Films intermittently, and then "shut down" production? Well, that's all I suggest for K64. A pre-paid ordering system would mean that Kodak wouldn't have to store the Master Roll in a freezer for two years -- it would be mostly sold in advance! Regarding production errors, doesn't Kodak carry insurance coverage for such things? :o
    Mr. Terry Mester

    www.zeuter.com/~tlmester



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE:


 
                     

Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin