Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,550   Posts: 1,544,784   Online: 1051
      
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    stradibarrius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Monroe, GA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,382
    Images
    163

    Do dark negatives equal over exposure?

    I recently shot two rolls of 120 Ektar 100 and all but two of the negatives are just dark with nothing there.
    Does that mean that I just blew them out with too much light?
    "Generalizations are made because they are generally true"
    Flicker http://www.flickr.com/photos/stradibarrius
    website: http://www.dudleyviolins.com
    Barry
    Monroe, GA

  2. #2
    SuzanneR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,735
    Images
    139
    Do the rest of the frames appear to be ok? Then, yes, probably way overexposed.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,544
    I would have thought that, even with considerable overexposure, there would still be some sort of image visible. Can you recall if there was anything unusual about the exposures which you gave to the faulty frames?

    Or could there have been an intermittent shutter fault which caused it not to close properly?

  4. #4
    Paul Sorensen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Saint Paul, MN
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,895
    Images
    26
    Yeah, I would agree that if there is really nothing there, then you have a shutter issue or HUGE over exposure, several stops at least. If it was just a normal over exposure, the kind caused by lighting issues, setting your meter at 400, that kind of thing, you would have negs that are less than optimal but have images on them. Perhaps even marginally printable. I think that if they are totally black, you likely have a shutter issue, or missed the exposure by a very large amount. (BTW, I am assuming that the rebates [edges] are normal, that only the frames are actually exposed, is that correct?)

  5. #5
    stradibarrius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Monroe, GA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,382
    Images
    163
    I used my hand held meter???Maybe I just had a brain fart but these two rolls were shot over a two week period?
    Is it at all possible that the lab could have done anything to cause this type problem
    "Generalizations are made because they are generally true"
    Flicker http://www.flickr.com/photos/stradibarrius
    website: http://www.dudleyviolins.com
    Barry
    Monroe, GA

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Iowa
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,045
    What camera did you use?
    In life you only get one great dog, one great car, and one great woman. Pet the dog. Drive the car. Make love to the woman. Don't mix them up.

  7. #7
    stradibarrius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Monroe, GA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,382
    Images
    163
    AN RB67 w/127mm Secor "C", Kodak Ektar 100 film. Obviously I just made a colossal mistake when I set the exposure. I will just work at it some more.
    "Generalizations are made because they are generally true"
    Flicker http://www.flickr.com/photos/stradibarrius
    website: http://www.dudleyviolins.com
    Barry
    Monroe, GA

  8. #8
    Marc Akemann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor area, Michigan
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,260
    Images
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by stradibarrius View Post
    AN RB67 w/127mm Secor "C", Kodak Ektar 100 film. Obviously I just made a colossal mistake when I set the exposure. I will just work at it some more.
    This may be a stupid question but, with this camera, are you consistently doing the proper sequence of cocking the shutter and advancing the film with the two appropriate levers? One on the camera body and one on the film back?

    Years ago, my first roll with an RB was a disaster because I kept forgetting to advance the film on a consistent basis.

    -Marc



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin