Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 74,088   Posts: 1,635,917   Online: 995
      
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 47
  1. #21
    ozphoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Bangkok, Thailand
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,186
    Images
    1
    Hi Alex,
    Who are you using for E6 processing these days?

  2. #22
    DanielStone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,095
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by PeteZ8 View Post
    Do you have others you could post? I'm trying to look at the ambient vs. background but it looks like the natural shadows fall in roughly the same area as where the line is so it's hard to tell if that was a mechanical error in your camera or something with the processing.

    Yes Kodachrome does need to be reexposed but AFIK the lights are all colored to develop the different bases, and it is reexposed in between the development stages of different layers of the film (develop, expose, develop, expose...). So I would expect a reexposure error to have a heavy color cast.

    Also, what kind of camera were you using? Were you using something with a vertical traveling multiblade shutter or a side curtain shutter like a Pentax K1000?




    __________________________________________________ ____________________________________________
    Yes, it was shot with a K1000. Using a Vivitar 283 on camera. If I remember correctly, I was using 60th for shutter speed (for ambient sunny behind)(max shutter sync speed on k1000) and aperture for flash fill.

    I might have accidentally set it at 1/125th or so, its my bad. I've just never had this happen before at all. But since it is in the same place in every frame, I guess it was my bad after all. Oh well, live and learn
    here are some more.







    -Dan


  3. #23

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Horsham, PA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    751
    Quote Originally Posted by Sirius Glass View Post
    This is why I stopped using Dwayne's a few years ago. They are only interested in processing as fast as they can and they don't need no stinkin' quality control.

    Steve
    Amen to that! My last roll (of E-6) that I got back came back as a clear strip of acetate. The only reason I sent it to them was to use up the old Kodak mailers, but damned if I'm going to use them any more!

  4. #24

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    607
    I have never had a problem with them on my E-6 just one roll of Kodachrome and a few 120 b/w rolls. How is Samy's with their processing? I hear that they are offering $5.00 E-6 processing and I am considering switching,

  5. #25

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Eastern Kansas
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    302
    Images
    1
    I've only sent a couple rolls of Kodachrome to Dwayne's in the past year or so and they came back just fine with no problems. They even called me with a question on one order and the lady was helpful and friendly on the phone.

    That being said, I sent them some 120 B&W for processing and scanning that I didn't want to do myself for some reason and the scans indicted there was a lot of dust - more like fuzz or hairs on the negatives that weren't blown off before scanning, so I think they have room for improvement on their cleanliness.

    I still have one roll of K200 and one roll of K64 in my freezer that I suppose will get shot and sent to them before the end of next year, but it seems to me Kodachrome has been suffering a long and slow death. I wish it was like the old days when I could drop a roll of Kodachrome off at my local K-Mart and it would get sent to a Kodak lab in Chicago or Dallas and would come back beautifully processed with lovingly care.

    I'm ready to move on now and have been exploring Kodak's line of E-6 films which I can get processed locally. I'm really impressed with some of these as well as some of Fuji's transparency films. Yes, I'll miss Kodachrome since I used it for so many years, but it looks like I'll get along just fine without it. Like others, I prefer more selection instead of less.

    Dave

  6. #26
    Iwagoshi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    NorCal
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    454
    Images
    17
    I do my own E-6, and have never had a problem with Dwayne's wrt Kodachrome. For me the turn around time for Dwayne's is about 5-day, for my E-6 it's about 2 months.

  7. #27

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,728
    Latest K64 back this morning...15 days door-to-door and first class processing as usual.

    These are the process-paid films as sold in the UK, and posted to-and-from Dwaynes via Kodak Switzerland. The boxes and mounts are Kodak branded....I don't know if all this involves any extra QC? If so, I hope that Kodak keep an eye on standards right up until the end of next year.

  8. #28

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    35
    What will they do about it? If you shoot Kodakchrome, you've got one choice for color processing, period. Kodak isn't going to fire up the old processors just because Dwaynes isn't doing great quality.

    Like the OP, I was underwhelmed by the quality of the slides returned from Dwaynes. I didn't have a particular objection, but they just didn't seem top quality to me.

  9. #29

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,728
    Quote Originally Posted by mrladewig View Post
    What will they do about it? If you shoot Kodakchrome, you've got one choice for color processing, period. Kodak isn't going to fire up the old processors just because Dwaynes isn't doing great quality.

    Like the OP, I was underwhelmed by the quality of the slides returned from Dwaynes. I didn't have a particular objection, but they just didn't seem top quality to me.
    I've no idea what they'd do!! In my experience, there isn't an issue at the moment, and I just said that I hoped Kodak would keep it that way for the next 12 months. :rolleyes:

    Kodachrome certainly doesn't work for everyone, depends on preferences, equipment and working practices, subjects and color vision, and other films may be better for any one photographer. I wouldn't use it for landscapes on dull days, for example. And certainly not, obviously, for a once-in-a-lifetime trip...the thought of relying on two trips half-way round the world to a single processor for each film would be too much for my nerves! (Own processing of E-6...can't blame anyone else then. )

  10. #30
    Ektagraphic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Southeastern Massachusetts
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,840
    Images
    23
    Just a year ago, Dwayne's was doing really, really, really good work with E-6 and K-14...not so much any more.
    Helping to save analog photography one exposure at a time

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin