Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,534   Posts: 1,544,052   Online: 1117
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    tiberiustibz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Tufts University
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,750
    Images
    5

    I found the grain!

    Today I enlarged 35mm negatives of Ektar 100 to 16x20 and I can now see the grain! It's still very small, but it's definitely there. It's now not a question of film resolution but lens sharpness. I just want to say that this film is amazing and I love it. I can now justify stocking up on $300 worth of supra endura.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Huntsville, Alabama and Oxford, Alabama
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    453
    Blog Entries
    2
    Images
    2
    I have a few rolls in my freezer that I've been wanting to shoot for a while, but it's been all rainy and crappy for the last month and a half here (the only "good" days were days I was busy, which is my usual luck).

    Hopefully i'll be able to burn through some Ektar soon
    "I have captured the light and arrested its flight! The sun itself shall draw my pictures!"

    -Louis Daguerre, 1839-

  3. #3
    fiducio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Tahoe, CA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    153
    Images
    6
    I have a bunch of 6x9 negatives you can try out at that size. And a bunch of 16x20 paper.

    My wonder now is about ektar 25...

  4. #4
    tiberiustibz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Tufts University
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,750
    Images
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by fiducio View Post
    My wonder now is about ektar 25...
    I'm fairly sure that it's not better, or at least not that much better. The film had approximately the same level of grain AFAIK because 2 decades of improvements allowed them to gain 2 stops of speed with the same grain. If the old Ektar 25 was frozen that increases the grain too, so you're probably better off shooting fresh film.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    625
    I have to admit, the reference to Ektar 25 threw me for a minute. Then I remembered that Kodak made such a thing. I seriously wish there were some slower color films out there (I like doing landscapes and still lifes), but it looks like 100 speed is about as good as it gets.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Huntsville, Alabama and Oxford, Alabama
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    453
    Blog Entries
    2
    Images
    2
    I'm getting impatient waiting to shoot my Ektar. I've heard a lot of good things about it, and I want to see what all the fuss is about.

    I'd like to see how big you have to enlarge to see the grain in medium format

    Any idea if they're going to release it in sheet film any time soon? 4x5 sheets of it might be pretty cool, even if it's going to be a while before I muve up to large format
    "I have captured the light and arrested its flight! The sun itself shall draw my pictures!"

    -Louis Daguerre, 1839-

  7. #7
    tiberiustibz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Tufts University
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,750
    Images
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by photomem View Post
    (I like doing landscapes and still lifes), but it looks like 100 speed is about as good as it gets.
    I said the same thing a while back and I guess the argument is if the speed can be made then why not? It's easy enough to use an ND filter but harder to gain speed if it's not there. If you want slow get some microfilm.

    Any idea if they're going to release it in sheet film any time soon? 4x5 sheets of it might be pretty cool, even if it's going to be a while before I muve up to large format
    I don't think so. They've got 160VC in 4x5 which is what I'm going to try out soon. Don't count on it though. It was hard enough to get it in 120.

  8. #8
    Leighgion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Orcas Island, WA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    357
    Images
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by photomem View Post
    it looks like 100 speed is about as good as it gets.
    There's Velvia 50 for E6, but far as C41 stuff goes 100 is as slow as it gets far as I know, yeah.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Fresno, CA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    55
    Well Kodachrome is at 64 speed but its been discontinued

  10. #10
    Athiril's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Melbourne, Vic, Australia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,523
    Images
    28
    I've pulled C41 film 14 stops in developing when doing tests, but only added +10 stops to box speed exposure, but still got a reasonable image.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin