Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,661   Posts: 1,481,591   Online: 947
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Baltimore
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    133

    I overexposed 160s at 25

    that's almost 3 stops.

    now what?

    I'd really prefer to be able to make optical prints but I understand if I'll have to go the hybrid route.


    Should I pull or should I develop normally and just try to print through it?

  2. #2
    2F/2F's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,008
    Images
    4
    I would say that you will be able to get pictures for sure, and that they will, in fact, be easier to get with analog printing than they will be with digital printing. At least it wasn't almost three stops of underexposure. You can pull color neg 1/2 stop without any issues...one stop if you can deal with a little bit wonky color in your shots. It will help a little. The negs will be printable, but grainier than normal, the contrast will be a bit different than you are used to (nothing but straight line, maybe with some weird-looking compression of the highest tones in some shots), and loss of saturation (on an already low-saturation film). Who knows? The film at one stop over should be perfectly fine. If you were using an in-camera reflected meter and shooting bright subjects, you were underexposing your negs anyhow, so that would help you out some more. The 1/2 stop pull will help you as well. Just be glad you were not shooting positives, such as transparencies or digital.
    2F/2F

    "Truth and love are my law and worship. Form and conscience are my manifestation and guide. Nature and peace are my shelter and companions. Order is my attitude. Beauty and perfection are my attack."

    - Rob Tyner (1944 - 1991)

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Baltimore
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    133
    Thank you. Any chance that it will fit in with prints from more normally exposed negs?


    I am definitely glad for the wonders of negative film. I was using a borrowed Mamiya 7 which explains how resetting the meter slipped my mind (and how it was set at 25 to begin with).

  4. #4
    hrst's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,300
    Images
    1
    You may get even better analog prints than normal. It depends on what you like. Contrast will be lower and it will work quite well with today's high-contrast papers, but, the highlights can be quite low in contrast compared to midtones... IMO, 3 stop overexposure won't add grain too much yet. 1 stop clearly removes grain. 3 stops may add a little bit, if you boost contrast using Ultra Endura or digital processes, but probably not with normal contrast paper.

    Post your results!.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    South Texas, USA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,885
    Some people actually make a habit of overexposing 2-3 f/stops especially for "high key" work. No need to panic, you'll be fine unless you're concerned about retaining maximum highlight detail in contrasty scenes. If that's the case then have the film pulled 2 stops and print hybridly... just don't tell anyone here on APUG. SSHHH... it's your little secret!!!

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Baltimore
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    133
    well I have been successfully reassured. Now I'm just upset that all my frames are likely blurry from the slow shutter speeds.

  7. #7
    RalphLambrecht's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    the villages .centralflorida,USA and Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,136
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by srmcnamara View Post
    that's almost 3 stops.

    now what?

    I'd really prefer to be able to make optical prints but I understand if I'll have to go the hybrid route.


    Should I pull or should I develop normally and just try to print through it?
    As others have stated already, no problem. I made good prints from negatives overexposed by 6 stops (Kodak had a sample at none time, showing that 10+ stops are workable).

    Look at the sample in the file attached and notice the beautiful shadow detail in the print from the overexposed negative.
    Attached Files
    Regards

    Ralph W. Lambrecht
    www.darkroomagic.comrorrlambrec@ymail.com[/URL]
    www.waybeyondmonochrome.com

  8. #8
    2F/2F's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,008
    Images
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike1234 View Post
    have the film pulled 2 stops and print hybridly... just don't tell anyone here on APUG. SSHHH... it's your little secret!!!
    I'd try pulling color neg. film two stops before you recommend it. I would also try to find a lab that will do it! Even if you could convince one to do so, they'd have to guess at a time, and could certainly not guarantee good results.

    I also don't see how a hybrid process would allow one to pull any more than one could with a totally analog process, which seemed to me to be the gist of your statement. A two stop pull of color negative film would not provide a negative that could be made to look "normal" by any means. Even with digital, you need to start with enough raw material in order to "fix" something, and a two stop pull will not provide that, due to the crazy and mismatched effect it will have on the density and color of the film's multiple layers. In general, your best bet with an underdeveloped color neg is to print it as a black and white print (using analog methods or doing it digitally).

    Additionally, how specifically do you suggest accomplishing the 2 stop pull? The C-41 development time is 3:15 - 3:30 minutes. I develop at 2:55 - 3:00 to get a 1/2 stop pull. IME, any further takes it beyond the realm of possible correction (or controllability with time, for that matter, as the time is so short).

    With color neg, it is way better to just be two stops over than to try to pull two stops. I would go ahead and pull the 1/2 stop, but no more.....except perhaps in the situation where "kind-of-but-not-really-perfect" color is acceptable, in which you could get away with pulling one stop.
    Last edited by 2F/2F; 10-28-2009 at 09:27 PM. Click to view previous post history.
    2F/2F

    "Truth and love are my law and worship. Form and conscience are my manifestation and guide. Nature and peace are my shelter and companions. Order is my attitude. Beauty and perfection are my attack."

    - Rob Tyner (1944 - 1991)

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    South Texas, USA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,885
    ^^^ It's a matter of tonal and contrast control without blocking of highlights.

  10. #10
    2F/2F's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,008
    Images
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike1234 View Post
    ^^^ It's a matter of tonal and contrast control without blocking of highlights.
    erm....with color negs it is also a matter of COLOR; a matter of getting all the layers to match in density within certain parameters in order to obtain raw material that will give the ability to predictably alter color balance, either with an enlarger or with a digital file.

    Just do as I suggested: pull a color neg two stops, try to print it...then come suggest it on the Internet.
    Last edited by 2F/2F; 10-28-2009 at 09:28 PM. Click to view previous post history.
    2F/2F

    "Truth and love are my law and worship. Form and conscience are my manifestation and guide. Nature and peace are my shelter and companions. Order is my attitude. Beauty and perfection are my attack."

    - Rob Tyner (1944 - 1991)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin