Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,328   Posts: 1,537,055   Online: 1045
      
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    A_M_Johnson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    55

    Side by Side Comparison of 220 Films

    I know there has to be a million threads on this but I can't find any so I am pre-apologizing for starting another one.

    I am looking around for some sort of comparison chart of 220 negative film, both color and B&W. Some films are obviously slide or reversal/transparency types which I'm not particularly interested in. From what I can see, the main brands are Kodak, Ilford, Fuji and maybe Agfa.

    Within the brands are various speeds, grain structures and other differences. It looks like there are three developing methods, C-41, E-6 and the B&W method I've used.

    So, any links, comments or walls of text would be appreciated. I have been using Tri-X and Fuji Pro 160 so far with this RB67 but I know there are many more films out there that might be better suited for me, depending on what the subject is. I am not intending on doing my own developing right now but will in the future.
    Web Site and Blog Follow me on Twitter Mamiya RB67, several 35MM cameras and an old Voigtlander Bessy that I use as a paperweight

  2. #2
    Chazzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    South Bend, IN, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,849
    Images
    5
    Ilford films are no longer available in 220. If Agfa films were ever available in 220, it is news to me. The only black and white emulsion currently available in 220 is Kodak's Tri-X Professional 320. As for the color print choices, I think your best bet would be to go to the Freestyle or B&H websites and see for yourself what is available from Kodak and Fuji.
    Charles Hohenstein

  3. #3
    Tony-S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    719
    Images
    14
    As far as I know only Tri-X Pro 320 is in 220 for B&W.

    Edit: Doh! Chazzy beat me to it.

  4. #4
    A_M_Johnson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    55
    Good idea about going to B&H's web site, thank you. I didn't think of that. I didn't realize that the options were so limited for B&W, I might have to stock up.

    I have some Fuji Pro 160 here. Is there a better film for color or is this about it too?
    Web Site and Blog Follow me on Twitter Mamiya RB67, several 35MM cameras and an old Voigtlander Bessy that I use as a paperweight

  5. #5
    Michel Hardy-Vallée's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Montréal (QC)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,351
    Images
    132
    Kodak nowadays only has its Portra line of films in 220 (160 VC/NC ; 400 VC/NC ; 800)

    According to Fuji's literature, all Fuji films available in 120 (including chromes; excluding Reala) are available in 220. But if you don't like chrome for your purpose, the options left are 160S, 160C, 400H, and 800Z.

    In sum, your choices in colour 220 are the competing equivalents between Fuji and Kodak. I personally prefer Kodak films for reasons of colour palette (most people prefer either manufacturer for similar reasons).

    I would say the only slight advantage in terms of offering on the Kodak side is that its 400 films come in saturated+contrasty (VC) and normal (NC) versions, whereas Fuji's only has one kind of 400.

    There you go!
    Using film since before it was hip.


    "One of the most singular characters of the hyposulphites, is the property their solutions possess of dissolving muriate of silver and retaining it in considerable quantity in permanent solution" — Sir John Frederick William Herschel, "On the Hyposulphurous Acid and its Compounds." The Edinburgh Philosophical Journal, Vol. 1 (8 Jan. 1819): 8-29. p. 11

    My APUG Portfolio

  6. #6
    Michel Hardy-Vallée's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Montréal (QC)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,351
    Images
    132
    Using film since before it was hip.


    "One of the most singular characters of the hyposulphites, is the property their solutions possess of dissolving muriate of silver and retaining it in considerable quantity in permanent solution" — Sir John Frederick William Herschel, "On the Hyposulphurous Acid and its Compounds." The Edinburgh Philosophical Journal, Vol. 1 (8 Jan. 1819): 8-29. p. 11

    My APUG Portfolio

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Van Buren, Arkansas
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    2,412
    Images
    101
    Why not consider using 120? There are far more choices there.

  8. #8
    Chazzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    South Bend, IN, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,849
    Images
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by PHOTOTONE View Post
    Why not consider using 120? There are far more choices there.
    Because some of us hate reloading film backs.
    Charles Hohenstein

  9. #9
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,241
    Images
    20
    Fortunately, I like TXP. I shoot more 120 than 220, but if there were more choices, I'd shoot more 220. Fewer reloads are an attraction when shooting actively, and being able to process twice as many shots easily in the same time as 120 can be a major attraction when I've been shooting a lot of film.

    I can shoot 220 in any of my Bronica S2A backs, which are switchable, and I have a Linhof 220 6x7 insert that I use in 6x7 backs for the 2x3" and 4x5" Technikas.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  10. #10
    A_M_Johnson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    55
    All I have is a 220 back for the near future. From what I'm seeing above, Kodak Portra 160VC might be nice to try outdoors in an urban setting. I'm in Las Vegas, so some vivid colors might make for some great images.
    Web Site and Blog Follow me on Twitter Mamiya RB67, several 35MM cameras and an old Voigtlander Bessy that I use as a paperweight



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin