Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,285   Posts: 1,535,271   Online: 881
      
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Athiril's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Melbourne, Vic, Australia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,498
    Images
    28

    Current film choice for snorkelling (Nikonos III)

    I'll be taking my Nikonos III with 35mm f/2.5 snorkelling where I live, probably with an 85A filter.

    And was wondering about fil choice.


    How does the Superia 4th colour layer hold up? 4th layer offer any benefits like in fluro light?

    You normally want a punchy film yeah? So how does Ektar hold up?

    Looking between:

    Fuji Fujicolor 100 ($3.43/roll)
    Fuji Sensia 100 ($6.87/roll)
    Fuji Provia 400X (~$13/roll for 3 pack ~$8.50/roll 10 pack)
    Fuji Superia 400 X-TRA ($4.04/roll)
    Fuji Pro 400H ($5.68/roll)
    Agfa Vista 400 ($4.58/roll)
    Kodak Ektar 100 ($7.58/roll)
    Kodak Portra 400VC (maybe.. $10/roll)

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Westminster, Maryland, USA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    1,504
    I would use a 400 ISO speed film because light is absorbed by water very quickly. It can be bright as the dickens on the surface, but once underwater, you'll discover it's pretty dark.
    When I grow up, I want to be a photographer.

    http://www.walterpcalahan.com/Photography/index.html

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austin
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    390
    Images
    11
    I'm in a similar spot, planning a trip to Hawaii in August.

    Athiril, why are you using the 85A filter? I'm an ignoramus on filters.

    I usually get nice results from 400 speed print film like Portra VC in underwater conditions, although it's usually a swimming pool! Ektar would probably be good and the price is good, but may be a bit slow if you're not using flash.
    Jeff Glass

    Photo Blog
    Website

  4. #4
    Josh Harmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    East Bay, Northern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    77
    Any 400 speed should be fine. In shallow water (say 10ft or less) 100 speed would be fine. I find that when I shoot underwater (mostly pools with my d******) I have to compensate for the blue cast of the water by adding a red filter on.

    -Josh
    Cameras:
    Canon EOS Elan II/E, Elan 7, and 630. -- Bronica ETRS -- Pentax 6x7
    My Website

  5. #5
    holmburgers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Rochester NY (native KS)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,418
    Images
    2
    What Josh said, the 85A (converts the overly blue sensitive tungsten film to look normal with the blue-drenched light of daylight... wow that sounded weird..) is to reduce the blue cast of underwater photography.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin