Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,646   Posts: 1,481,272   Online: 846
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Fuji Press 1600

  1. #1
    olleorama's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    526
    Images
    5

    Fuji Press 1600

    What's your take? Have only seen lousy scans on flickr, seems to be more noise than grain. But a few people does it really good as it seems. How large have you wet printed it with good result? Any improvement if overexposing?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    373
    Quote Originally Posted by olleorama View Post
    What's your take? Have only seen lousy scans on flickr, seems to be more noise than grain. But a few people does it really good as it seems. How large have you wet printed it with good result? Any improvement if overexposing?
    I only did color darkroom printing during a class a few years ago, but I was pleased that this film gave better results this way than scanning, where grain builds up. I did an 11x14 shot under spotlights that came out well. Rate your ISO at 1000 or even 800.

  3. #3
    CGW
    CGW is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,798
    Shot at box speed, Fuji 1600 wasn't pretty; even 1/3-2/3 stops over didn't help grain much. For me, it was kind of a last ditch film when I knew fast glass and a monopod or tripod might allow for some workable shots. That said, I always liked Superia 800 way more, even at ISO800. An 8x10 from Superia 1600 rated at ISO1000 was just barely passable. Rated at ISO1250 and 1600, 4x6 was about it with 5x7s showing too much grain for my taste.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Richmond VA.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,540
    I shot at 1600, while it it was grainy it was doable.

    Jeff

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    38
    I found I got better color and grain shooting Superia 800 at EI1600, even without changing the development, when compared side by side with 1600. If you need EI 3200 color film, though, I'd rather give it a go with the 1600 than try to push Superia 800 2 stops.

  6. #6
    olleorama's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    526
    Images
    5
    Thanks for your valuable advice. I did buy a 20 roll box, and will see what I like.

  7. #7
    2F/2F's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,008
    Images
    4
    I like it if I want lots of grain. But for most things, I would prefer to overdevelop the 800 and lose some shadow detail and gain some contrast.

    Where are you finding it in Press packages?
    2F/2F

    "Truth and love are my law and worship. Form and conscience are my manifestation and guide. Nature and peace are my shelter and companions. Order is my attitude. Beauty and perfection are my attack."

    - Rob Tyner (1944 - 1991)

  8. #8
    olleorama's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    526
    Images
    5
    Private seller on another photo forum. It's well expired. I think I will have to shoot it at 800 or so due to the age.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    373
    Quote Originally Posted by olleorama View Post
    Private seller on another photo forum. It's well expired. I think I will have to shoot it at 800 or so due to the age.
    Maybe even EI 500. Remember, even when fresh, it's not really a 1600 speed film. More like 1150. A lot of the grainy, underexposed results you're seeing online are due to underexposure.

    I treat it like ISO 1000 when it's fresh. If it's more than a year out of date, don't expect to be able to get even EI 800 out of it. Fast film ages fast. Some rough guidelines:

    Fresh............................................. .......EI 1000 or maybe 1250
    At expiration date....................................EI 800 or maybe 1000
    A few months past expiration (frozen)........EI 800
    A year past expiration (frozen)..................EI 640
    Two years past expiration.........................EI 500
    3-4 years............................................. .EI 500 or maybe even 400

    You could theoretically push process, but the more expired the film is, the less well it tolerates that. I wouldn't bother unless you're after a special effect.
    Last edited by B&Wpositive; 05-11-2011 at 11:08 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  10. #10
    2F/2F's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,008
    Images
    4
    ...and a lot of underexposure is due to using in-camera meters, which most people do. So, you should do your own personal speed test to find out how to rate it, and then expose it well for best results.
    2F/2F

    "Truth and love are my law and worship. Form and conscience are my manifestation and guide. Nature and peace are my shelter and companions. Order is my attitude. Beauty and perfection are my attack."

    - Rob Tyner (1944 - 1991)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin