Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,224   Posts: 1,532,610   Online: 897
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    121

    Capacity of Kodak Flexicolor (C41) chemicals

    I appreciate that there have been numerous posts about C41 home developing in the recent past, but I have not been able to find people's experiences with the number of rolls of 120 (or 135) film that can be developed using Kodak chemicals. I must confess that I have recently used the Tetenal powders (which uses a blix) and have been happy with the results; but there have been many posts about the superiority of separate bleach and fix and I am investigating whether this would be a good approach for me.

    There seem to be two manufacturers of small batches of non-blix C41 chemicals for home use: the Rollei kit and the repackaged Kodak chemicals from Photographic Formulary. The latter costs $20+ for a 1L kit. Unfortunately, the Kodak docs on developing C41 in small tanks recommend only 2 rolls of 120 film per liter. This comes to $10+ per roll for processing, not a very economical approach. The Rollei kit seems to have a larger capacity.

    I would be interested in people's experiences with the capacities of non-blix kits (particularly Kodak). Thanks.

    Warren Nagourney
    Last edited by warrennn; 08-20-2011 at 01:21 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  2. #2
    markbarendt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Ignacio, CO, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,665
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    19
    Each set of chemicals has it's own capacity so consulting the literature for the maker and the specific formulation you are using is important.

    There's the normal Kodak Flexicolor, Kodak SM, the one's you mentioned, plus Trebla has a couple variants, one of which I use.

    Most C41 film is developed in replenished systems, not one shot and toss, and done at exactly 3:15, so capacity has a tolerance based on that exact time. Tetanol and Photo Formulary adjust the time for extra rolls, that changes the capacity.

    Look for "replenishment rate" in the Kodak (or Trebla) info.

    Replenished I'm under a buck a roll and it's not tough once you learn it, basically just pour off a bit of the used stuff after each run to make room then add "x" ml per roll of fresh chemicals to top up for the next run.
    Mark Barendt, Ignacio, CO

    "We do not see things the way they are. We see things the way we are." Anaïs Nin

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    744
    I get 48 rolls of 120 or 35 per 5L in my phototherm, using regular kodak flexicolor chems. I use the dev as one shot, and recycle the bleach at least 3 times. I use fix and stab. as one shot also. I could reuse the fix and dev, but would rather not bother. Fix Is super cheap anyway.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    121
    I use a tank which requires about 500 ml per roll of 120. If I used it one-shot, I would get 2 rolls for about $14 per roll -- about 3.5 times as much as commercial processing. I have little interest in investing in an automated processor for reasons of initial cost, maintenance and the fact that I don't mind in the least using a tank (with my temperature stabilized bath).

    wn

  5. #5
    markbarendt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Ignacio, CO, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,665
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    19
    I'm doing some right now and made up 1.25 liters of developer to do 27 rolls with a tank that needs 570 ml.

    With the chemicals I use about 32 ml per roll is needed to replenish.
    Mark Barendt, Ignacio, CO

    "We do not see things the way they are. We see things the way we are." Anaïs Nin

  6. #6
    Athiril's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Melbourne, Vic, Australia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,496
    Images
    28
    You must be using LORR or LORR LU

    Regular Flexicolor has a higher replenishment rate than 32mL.. it depends on the film.

    Z-131 specifies some replenishment rates.. Portra 160/400 and Ektar sheets specify their own.

    Kodak CIS-49 specifies amounts you need to mix up for replenisher and tank solution in smaller quantitues
    http://www.kodak.com/global/en/profe...is49/cis49.pdf

    Flexicolor LORR is $46 for 10L worth here.

    That has replenishment capacity of around 285-400 rolls depending on replenishment rate of the film. (for LORR)

    I use a 1.5L solution that I replenish from, so you'd have a bit more than 8.5L worth to replenish with, which at that rate would go 242 to 350 films before running out of replenisher. (for LORR)

    The developer inexpensive, the bleach a bit more expensive. Still economical.


    Regular flexicolor has about half the capacity of LORR (replenishment rate is about twice as much iirc).

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    West Chester, PA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    14
    Hey Warren,

    I have the Kodak chemicals from Photographer's Formulary. I mixed 500ml back on May 8th, and last week processed my 7th roll of 120 and 5th roll of 35mm on the same chemicals. The film has all been Fuji 800Z, Kodak Portra 800, and Kodak Ultramax 800 (35mm). I am not taking scientific photographs requiring perfect color, and since I am scanning I don't even really have any idea how close the exact colors are. However, I get negatives that look 'right' to me and scan fine.

    Hope this helps,
    Sean

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Southbury, Connecticut
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    26
    More a question than an answer, might I suggest that chemical ageing seems to be especially critical with color processing. After a month, whether chemically exhausted according to the manufacturer's specs or not, I have observed that color developer and blix become suddenly less effective. If, like me, you process only a few color rolls each month, you may want to accumulate a good-sized lot of exposed color film in your refrigerator, then mix up a fresh batch of color chemistry and process it all at once - observing the manufacturer's specs at least nominally.
    [FONT="Arial"][/FONT]John Weinland

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    121
    Thanks Sean and the others -- I suspected that the Phot. Formulary chemicals would last longer than one roll per 500 ml of solution.

    I mixed up the Tetenal powders (1 liter) a few weeks ago and processed my third roll yesterday -- the results were fine (the last two rolls were 3 year out-of-date NPH and they optically printed fine on Kodak and Fuji papers).

    Frankly, so far my experience with the blix-based Tetenal has been good, so I might forego the use of non-blix chemicals. Kodak certainly doesn't make it easy for amateurs to use their products!

    wn

  10. #10
    hpulley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Guelph, Ontario, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,214
    Images
    75
    Kodak doesn't make it easy for us to buy Flexicolor! I can't get it anywhere in Canada or shipped to Canada so I'm stuck with Tetenal/JOBO blix kits but they seem to work fine for me too. I get 25 rolls per litre (non-replenished) before it dies on me after weeks or even months of use.
    Harry Pulley - Visit the BLIND PRINT EXCHANGE FORUM

    Happiness is...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin