Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,690   Posts: 1,548,868   Online: 942
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    26

    Kodacolor X C-22 Old Film Found

    A friend of mine gave me an old Meopta Flexaret VI TLR and inside I found a roll of exposed 120 Kodacolor X.

    I've done some searching on processing this and, aside from the Rocky Mountain Company, http://www.rockymountainfilm.com/c22.htm, how would one develope this? I read a few suggestions about developing it in D-76 or other B&W developer to try to at least salvage the silver image. One other company, http://www.filmrescue.com also suggests trying to get good B&W and forget about the color.

    Anyone have experience with this.

    Thanks

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,879
    Images
    11
    Yes, it is possible to develop C-22 in modified C41 chemistry - but with only 1 roll, I don't recommend it.

    It is probably safest to develop it as a B&W negative (I would use a compensating developer - not D76). With only one roll (and no possiblility for experimentation) development may be tricky.

    Probably easier to just send it to rockymountain.
    Tom Hoskinson
    ______________________________

    Everything is analog - even digital :D

  3. #3
    127
    127 is offline
    127's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    uk
    Shooter
    127 Format
    Posts
    581
    The Speedibrews Celer-41 kit claims it can do C22. They basically sugguest deving for about 12 mins at room temperature. I'd suspect that most room temperature compatable C-41 would probably work OK.

    I tried it on a roll I aquired and the results were pretty poor, but then it was a 30 year old film - there was something on their, and I could probably have printed something if it had been interesting. The kit cost about 10 pounds, and I used it on a whole bunch of old and out of date films, so it was worth trying.

    I wouldn't expect much from it, and wouldn't pay to have it done commercially unless you've reason to believe theres something really special on there.

    Ian

  4. #4
    Eric Rose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Calgary AB, Canada
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    4,259
    Images
    73
    You could cut the film in half and try one half in Rodinal first to see what comes out.
    www.ericrose.com
    yourbaddog.com

    "civility is not a sign of weakness" JFK

    "The Dude abides" - the Dude

  5. #5
    Brac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    UK
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    626
    There is also a company in the UK who will process C22 films (any size) to a colour image, but they're not cheap. They are called, surprise surprise, Process C22. Don't have their web address to hand but a search will find them.

  6. #6
    Stan. L-B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    London & Friars Cliff Dorset UK
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    342
    Images
    1
    I would go for a CA41 development and give it about 10% boost. Or better still, give it a clip test and get the best pssible results at the second dunk!
    If you were this side of the pond I would gladly do it for you....Stan. L-B
    'Determine on some course more than a wild exposure to each chance' The Bard.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,879
    Images
    11
    Just a reminder - C22 film emulsions were not designed for high temperature processing like the C41 emulsions are. If you process the film in C41 chemistry it should be with one of the (several available) low temperature C41 processes.
    Tom Hoskinson
    ______________________________

    Everything is analog - even digital :D

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    26
    What is the affect of using a "compensating" developer? Someone suggested Rodinal but Refinal is an Agfa compensating developer.

    I think I'll cut a few inches from the film and give it a try.

    Thanks for your answer.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,879
    Images
    11
    Quote Originally Posted by pkerr
    What is the affect of using a "compensating" developer? Someone suggested Rodinal but Refinal is an Agfa compensating developer.

    I think I'll cut a few inches from the film and give it a try.

    Thanks for your answer.
    I have no experience with Refinal. My choice would be Diafine (or the Diafine substitute formulation posted on APUG threads).

    Doing a snip test is a good idea.
    Tom Hoskinson
    ______________________________

    Everything is analog - even digital :D

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    26
    Success!

    I cut a small piece of the film and put it through some Ilfosol S at 9 minutes. I could see just a tiny smudge so I tried another 2 inches at 15 minutes and saw "a smiling face". Then I did the whole film for 20 minutes and although the whole thing has a dark orange mask, I could see sharp images.

    I know this is APUG but, how to share the images, okay I scanned them and here's a sample. Anyone know what year that Oldsmobile is? I tried to see the year on the license plate and my guess is 1975,

    http://web.ncf.ca/ac210/photography/kodacolorx.jpg

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin