Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,989   Posts: 1,524,089   Online: 1124
      
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,554

    UV glass in negative carrier

    Any reason NOT to use UV glass in a negative carrier (Saunders VCCE diffusion head - quartz halogen)? It's not that I want UV glass per se, just that one of the particular glasses I'm experimenting with only comes a UV coating.

    Is there even a meaningful amount of UV-range light in the system? I'm just wondering because I suppose if there was, and you filtered it out, and further assume enlarging paper sensitivity extends into that range, you'd need longer exposures, or even slightly different filtration with VC papers (need to boost contrast slightly due to filtering of some blue-violet spectrum.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Winnipeg, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,301
    Shouldn't make a difference, most halogen bulbs made these days already have a UV blocking coating on them already. On the other hand, quartz capsule halogens can put out a lot of UV if you run them hot enough.
    Bob

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    San Clemente, California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,062
    Quote Originally Posted by Michael R 1974 View Post
    Any reason NOT to use UV glass in a negative carrier (Saunders VCCE diffusion head - quartz halogen)?...Is there even a meaningful amount of UV-range light in the system?...
    No reason NOT to. In fact, I suspect doing so would be beneficial. Of all enlarger light sources I'm familiar with, halogen lamps are the only ones that emit UV.

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael R 1974 View Post
    ...I'm just wondering because I suppose if there was, and you filtered it out, and further assume enlarging paper sensitivity extends into that range...
    See page 81 of Ctien's Post Exposure


    for the full explanation of why you might experience focus shift with certain enlarging lenses in this situation.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,554
    Yeah I started a lengthy thread a while back on here regarding that residual-short wavelength focus shift thing. I ran detailed tests (initial tests posted in the thread) and found zero evidence of it in my system with the papers I use. There was some disagreement in the thread regarding whether the amounts of UV-range light (if any) in quartz halogen systems is anything more than trivial. In the end I'm not sure we answered that particular question.

    I think you're probably right though, I can't see how it would hurt to use UV glass. In fact, I'm just thinking, doesn't the base of TMax 100 filter UV? In the end I guess as long as you standardize for a certain set of equipment you're fine.

    Thanks Bob and Sal. I'll include this particular glass in my experiments.

  5. #5
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,134
    Quote Originally Posted by Michael R 1974 View Post

    Is there even a meaningful amount of UV-range light in the system?
    Most tungsten/halogen light source in enlargers that I am familiar with have a UV filter somewhere in the system. Maybe incorporated into the light box if you don't see an obvious glass in front of the lamp.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    San Clemente, California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,062
    Quote Originally Posted by Michael R 1974 View Post
    ...doesn't the base of TMax 100 filter UV?...
    Indeed it does. Yet another reason the glass won't hurt if that's the film you're printing from.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Cardigan, West Wales
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    90
    Certainly there is heat absorbing glass in some enlargers - in my Devere condensor head it has a slight green cast - but I don't know if it filters UV as a by product. I suspect there would be no stong reason to suggest that a UV filter would be detrimental to the projected image and I would think it would have good enough optical quality when sandwiched to the negative.
    Regards, Mark Walker.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin