Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,745   Posts: 1,515,653   Online: 754
      
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 29 of 29
  1. #21
    Klainmeister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Santa Fe, NM
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,493
    Images
    30
    !!!!!
    K.S. Klain

  2. #22
    sharris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    48
    Images
    19
    great stuff...and is why i like to ask about experience here..find out what is possible. really like those images and the border is great. i've got a ccouple images i want to enlarge from a yashica g that are special to me amd i think the grain and imperfection will be glorious.

  3. #23
    EKDobbs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    NC
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    124
    Quote Originally Posted by NB23 View Post
    Thanks Brian and Klainmeister,

    I hope you saw the man hiding which is what makes the image, IMO.
    The edges are from the negative holder being slightly wider then the negative itself. I never crop my images so all my prints have this border that I personally find quite appealing.
    That's exactly what I saw at the Diane Arbus exhibit. It's beautiful, and so much simpler than the stark white borders (which will always be ever-so-slightly misaligned). My only question is, where do you get a negative holder slightly larger than your negative? Mine barely leaves room for the edges.
    In other worlds he has
    darker days, blacker swells.
    Strokes that mix noir revenge
    on waves of grey.

  4. #24
    Klainmeister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Santa Fe, NM
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,493
    Images
    30
    File it down.
    K.S. Klain

  5. #25
    EKDobbs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    NC
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    124
    That's what I had guessed, but I almost hoped it wasn't quite so barbaric.
    In other worlds he has
    darker days, blacker swells.
    Strokes that mix noir revenge
    on waves of grey.

  6. #26
    Klainmeister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Santa Fe, NM
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,493
    Images
    30
    Sometimes barbarism is the only answer....
    K.S. Klain

  7. #27

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    654
    Here’s a viable alternative to barbarism.

    Rather than ruin a perfectly good negative carrier, simply make a temporary one of mat board or thinner card stock. I do this all the time with old roll films of sizes not made in 40 years or longer.

    If you need to keep a negative critically flat in a glass carrier, that too is easy. I’d choose a larger carrier, say 6 x 9 cm or 4” x 5” and cut an oversized-window mask from a piece of scrap FB print. The window is easily cut with a single-edged safety-razor blade. Lay the window mask centered over the negative and close the carrier. The glass carrier will keep the negative flat and you’ll project the jagged black edges you want without permanently ruining a good carrier.

    You can also experiment with differnt size borders by making masks of different opening sizes.
    Last edited by Ian C; 11-04-2012 at 10:12 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  8. #28
    erikg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    pawtucket rhode island usa
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,389

    Going from 11x14 to 16x24 or 20x24

    What Ian said. I have a large collection of mat board negative carriers of various odd formats that I have made over the years. I also wouldn't hesitate to enlarge a 6x7 negative to 20x24 or bigger, but of course it depends on the image in question. There's no general rule against it in my darkroom anyway.

  9. #29

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Los Alamos, NM
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,038
    20X24 would be near or maybe even beyond the height capability of the 23C. Crank it all the way up, focus, and see if the image is big enough to fill the paper. An easel for 20X24 would probably have to be home built, but that needn't be too complicated. Exposure time increases in proportion to area plus an adjustment for reciprocity failure, so you may be facing very long exposures. Sink space is usually the greatest problem with big enlargements. 16X20 can be handled in trays in many darkrooms and in rotary processing tubes just about anywhere. 20X24 gets difficult, but you can probably build a suitable tube and some rig to rotate it on (hand power is possible). With bigger paper, handling time increases, and that causes some additional problems. Particularly with tubes, you may need to dilute the developer to get longer processing times, Or you could select a slow developer. Having the extra time will reduce splotches and irregularities that may occur while changing solutions. You will have to test to determine development times and how dilution affects contrast. Big prints require more solution, too.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin