Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 64,069   Posts: 1,347,244   Online: 821
      
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22
  1. #11

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    483
    Remember that selenium toning affects the silver that is present in the neg. Where you have empty shadows (ie. clear film-base) there is no silver and therefore no increase in density from the selenium. The overall contrast is increased, as the difference between "no silver" and "silver plus selenium" is larger, but nothing is going to magically recover detail that you didn't place on the negative.

    You could always try making a copy negative and reversing it, or make a copy of the copy. The quickest thing to try would indeed be using a harder developer, as many have pointed out.

    Edit: I have just recalled that, during a 25 sheet try out, I seemed to get a slightly higher contrast result from the Adox MCC remake of the Agfa papers, than from Ilford. Perhaps that would be an option?
    Last edited by MartinP; 10-02-2012 at 04:12 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  2. #12
    jnanian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    here
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    13,810
    Blog Entries
    52
    Images
    370
    Quote Originally Posted by tkamiya View Post
    I didn't think of using a different developer. I currently have Dektol only. I understand increase in hydroquinone adds to contrast. I wonder if this is possible? I don't know enough photo chemistry but I know Dektol had hydroquinone as a component already. I happen to have a small jar of it thinking I'd start mixing my own.
    what dilution do you use your dektol ?
    if you are using it 1:2 or 1:3 you might increase it to 1:1
    or even a higher concentration of developer ...

    you might also look into split filtration printing if you aren't already doing that
    it might also help you get the contrast you want ...
    there is an article on les mclean's website
    right ... here: http://www.lesmcleanphotography.com/...ull&article=21


    good luck !
    john
    Les chaussettes de l'archiduchesse sont-elles sèches? Archi-sèches!

    ••Silver Magnet's .. $$ from spent fixer*••
    ••website••
    ••blog••

    need some coffee? i might be able to help ...

  3. #13
    Jim Noel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,646
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Gerald C Koch View Post
    If you think that selenium toner will not produce enough intensification you can try using a chromium intensifier on the negative. I would suggest that you read up on this process before you try it. If the negative has been improperly fixed or washed there could be problems.
    A better and safer way to boost the negative contrast is to tone in selenium diluted 1+4 from stock. About 5 minutes should do it.
    Also bleaching and then redeveloping, particularly in any pyrogallol developer, works very well.
    [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Films NOT Dead - Just getting fixed![/FONT]

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    1,346
    I don't plan to read all the foregoing bits of advice, so forgive me if I repeat something already mentioned. Some VC papers will not reach DMax given only high-contrast exposure using magenta or
    blue light. You might need to supplement this with at least a token amount of white light, but keep it
    brief unless you add an ND filter. You can only develop so long - maybe four minutes of so in a silver
    rich paper, until it hits the max; after that you only increase fog. And it does help to use premium
    papers. But even that can be boosted by a combination of selenium and gold toning (rinse between
    these steps, though the order is unimportant). Some papers are way better in this respect than others, and image tone differences are an inevitable and possibly desirable by-product. There are more advanced ways to do it to: contrast-increase masking, neg intensification or duplication, etc.

  5. #15
    RalphLambrecht's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    the villages .centralfloridausa and Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,488
    Images
    1
    i think, you are best of with the bleaching suggestion.
    Regards

    Ralph W. Lambrecht
    www.darkroomagic.comrorrlambrec@ymail.com[/URL]
    www.waybeyondmonochrome.com

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Central Florida, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,545
    Images
    10
    I'm really bad at bleaching..... So far, every time I tried, I ended up basically destroying my print.
    Develop, stop, fix.... wait.... where's my film?

  7. #17

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Central Florida, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,545
    Images
    10
    I was using matte surface paper which tends to look lower in contrast. I'm going to use glossy and use more concentrated dilution of Dektol to start. I'll report back when I have some results. Thanks everybody.
    Develop, stop, fix.... wait.... where's my film?

  8. #18
    Guillaume Zuili's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles & Paris
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,597
    Images
    207
    All the above plus you could give a try with Dokumol. Very strong dev.

  9. #19

    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Mohave Desert
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    428
    My exprience is that multigrade paper will not be much use to you if you need a real #5 paper. You need to see if they make "real" single-grade #5 paper. I think it was Agfa that used to make a #6.

  10. #20

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    5
    A contrast increase mask is very powerful.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:


 
                          

Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin