Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 76,263   Posts: 1,680,700   Online: 891
      
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    1

    How about Durst M670 color head? GOOD or BAD?

    I want to know from people who experience with this enlarger durst M670.

    Is it good?

    i heard many people from photo.net said something like it lose focus....

    something like taht or plastic equipment....

    iS it that bad?


    thank krub

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Somerset England
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2
    My experience in a college environment where the equipment is heavily used(and abused?) is that the rack for altering the height of the head on the 670 tends to wear as it appears to be made of plastic. This causes the head to slip and not to hold its focus. The general standard of construction seems to be less substantial than the earlier Durst models. The 605 for instance is much more robust and has a metal rack. Another well commented upon make is the Meopta Magnifax. If you are buying used it is as well to check the wear on the elevating column on any enlarger as well as the alignment of the head by using a spirit level. Hope this helps John

  3. #3
    clogz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,842
    Images
    114
    Mmm just checked my 605 and it has a plastic rack.
    Digital is best taken with a grain of silver.

  4. #4
    NikoSperi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Italy
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    576
    Images
    15
    I have the 670 VC - variable contrast head. But it makes no difference to your question I believe. I have no problems with creeping column or focus... but I did get it brand new.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,042
    I've used 670's in college darkrooms and never had any problems. I guess it's the same as everything else and just depends on how it's been abused in the past. Give it a good look over and play with the adjustments before you buy.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Ayrshire Scotland
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    386
    Images
    4
    Hello supree,

    I bought mine secondhand. When enlarging I tend to keep the winder in the verticle position, ie handle to the top or bottom, in between I find it can tend to creep. This doesn't really bother me at all. I also find I have to be very gentle when switching filters on my condensor head.

    Maybe give Lex a shout (the perpendicularity consultant one, you can find him on the B&W forums at photonet). I'm not sure but I think he may have had this problem with his M605. There may be a way to tighten it up.

    It's a pretty good enlarger overall though. Oh the thing that does bug me is my 35mm mask is slightly smaller than a 35mm neg, must get round to filling it out a bit some day.

    Try and get the VC or the condensor head if you can rather than the colour head.

    All the best.

  7. #7
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    17,006
    Images
    148
    Quote Originally Posted by supree_l
    I want to know from people who experience with this enlarger durst M670.

    Is it good?

    i heard many people from photo.net said something like it lose focus....

    something like taht or plastic equipment....
    I've had 2 Durst M601's and a later M670 the column mechanism's are essentially the same on most of these Dursts.

    Yes they do begin to start to slip with very heavy use, but it's not the racking - there are two friction pads in the height control assembly once these wear the counter spring slowly creeps the head up the column.

    All you have to do is take the cover plate off, 4 screws, then tighten these pads so they pinch properly, making sure by trying the height adjustment that you haven't over tightened.

    I'd add it's worth cleaning the metal bits first as its probable that its a litle surface corrosion has accelerated the wear to the pads.

    It's extremely simple and once done is as good as new.

    I should add that in 30 years I've only had to do this once, and checking in my darkroom to write this I noticed I'm actually still using a 30yr old column with a much newer enlarger head.

    Hope that helps, the M670 is a superb enlarger, my earlier Dursts had many years of continuous commercial use, with no problems.

    Ian

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Ayrshire Scotland
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    386
    Images
    4
    Cheers Ian,

    I think this is what I saw Lex post some time ago.
    Must make a point of getting round to this.
    Anyway this time I'll save the post so I'll remember what to do.

    Thanks,

    Gareth.

    Oh yeah Supree if you see one with a Durst Neonon f2.8 lens then that's a bonus. The neonon's can often be found in the bargin bin at some secondhand dealers, they are a steal, pretty much as good as any big name enlarger lens you care to metion.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Grant View Post
    I've had 2 Durst M601's and a later M670 the column mechanism's are essentially the same on most of these Dursts.

    Yes they do begin to start to slip with very heavy use, but it's not the racking - there are two friction pads in the height control assembly once these wear the counter spring slowly creeps the head up the column.

    All you have to do is take the cover plate off, 4 screws, then tighten these pads so they pinch properly, making sure by trying the height adjustment that you haven't over tightened.

    I'd add it's worth cleaning the metal bits first as its probable that its a litle surface corrosion has accelerated the wear to the pads.

    It's extremely simple and once done is as good as new.

    I should add that in 30 years I've only had to do this once, and checking in my darkroom to write this I noticed I'm actually still using a 30yr old column with a much newer enlarger head.

    Hope that helps, the M670 is a superb enlarger, my earlier Dursts had many years of continuous commercial use, with no problems.

    Ian
    Ian, you seem like someone with a lot of experience with the Durst M670. I've been trying to revive the use of the old film processing equipment in my Uni's photography society. It's been a steep learning curve. I've managed to get 120 C-41 film from a Mamiya 220 developed and now I'm on to the step of making some prints. I think that the colour enlarger available to is the M670 but I have an eerie feeling that it can't develop larger than 35mm film. Could I ask you if I'm wrong here?

    Also, sorry to the OP if I'm hi-jacking this thread.

  10. #10
    paul_c5x4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ye Olde England
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,801
    Images
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by shgavman View Post
    I think that the colour enlarger available to is the M670 but I have an eerie feeling that it can't develop larger than 35mm film.
    You should be able to print from any negative up to 6x7 (this includes 35mm, 645, & 6x6) as long as the appropriate masks are available. If they are missing, then you can cut some new ones out of mount board without to much difficulty.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin