Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,198   Posts: 1,531,450   Online: 815
      
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 33
  1. #1
    ChristopherCoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Armpit of Texas
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,190
    Images
    28

    I tried split grade again, and filed my carrier...

    I finally got around to filing out my negative carrier. I picked up two additional, so that if I mess one up I still have a good one to make 'clean' prints with. I decided to use it on the images below because I thought it fit the feel of photo. I think I need to file it some more though because I'm not getting the black borders enough. Maybe I need to file the top silver part back as well.

    Anyway, I decided to try split grade printing again. Since there was such an uproar about the last time I tried, and y'all stressed that it was useful on high contrast negatives, I decided to try this image. It was an image I took on TriX-400 using my old manual Nikon FM and a 50mm series E. I printed this for the last postcard exchange and threw a filter 1 on it for however many seconds and got a hazy, low contrast image. I enjoyed it, but I did get a few comments that said it lacked punch. So I decided to see if I could give it the punch it needed.

    For comparison, this is a straight scan of the postcard that I sent out. They were all printed the same way.


    MusicPC005w by ChristopherCoy, on Flickr


    For starters today, I produced this image using filter 00 at 6 seconds, then filter 5 at 8 seconds. It's a little darker than I liked, but I had detail in the shadows like the musicians ear, and the architecture behind his right elbow.

    This are all at f8 on the enlarger.


    Music1002w by ChristopherCoy, on Flickr


    I thought the above image was ok, and didn't want to go on wasting paper, so I decided to try another negative. I produced this image using filter 00 at 4 secs, and filter 5 at 8 secs. I noticed that there was a little more detail in the texture of his hat, and I also noticed a little more detail in the architecture in the background. The building wasn't so 'blah' and the white on the patio ledge stood out a little more.


    Music3004w by ChristopherCoy, on Flickr


    So then I thought "These two images were taken just seconds apart, and if it looks this good at 4 seconds, I wonder what the last print would look like at 2 seconds and 8 seconds. So thats what I did. I went back and reloaded the original negative and flashed it for 2 seconds with filter 00, and then 8 seconds with filter 5.
    I noticed that the shadows in the background are much more opened up, but they aren't "blah" like they are in the post card. I've got paper white in there, nice blacks, and gray variations in between.


    Music2003w by ChristopherCoy, on Flickr


    I need to continue on this one some more because I am missing some detail in his hand that is strumming the guitar, which you can see in the post card image, so I think that I could probably use some burning there. I could probably dodge his ear just a little bit, and I think that I would also like to see the bottom burned just a tad more (around his knees). I'm sure that I would like a vignette a little bit as well.

    I'd like to hear your thoughts, suggestions, or opinions on how I can continue to improve this image. Please, I'm begging you though, don't turn this into another split-grade vs straight printing argument.
    Last edited by ChristopherCoy; 01-29-2013 at 03:51 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Central Florida, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,919
    I like the harsh contrast you achieved in the image. Although you are right, portions of the musician's arms are too hot. You might actually need to flash the paper for this.

    As to dirty border, (I'm sorry for being direct) I think it's a bit weird. I would suggest filing a bit more so you can get a nice border all the way around the image. Also, the way it's reflecting light, it is creating a halo around the solid black area. To me, it looks strange. On the 3rd image, you may need to burn the second half guy on left bottom so he doesn't grab so much attention. Similarly, two guys on the right on the second image, I'd burn them in a bit.
    Develop, stop, fix.... wait.... where's my film?

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Daventry, Northamptonshire, England
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    6,904
    Overall I like the straight scan as much as the split grade versions. While the last split grade version has real possibilities to be slightly better than the straight scan it might, as tkamiya has sa,d, need flashing to tone down the arms which are hot.

    However have you tried to alter the grade by half a grade divisions at a time. You might find that there is a half grade increase and a slightly different exposure setting that gets you very close to the split grade version without flashing.

    As you are experimenting anyway then this might be a worthwhile exercise.

    I might of course not be a punchy print afficionado compared to those who have commented in the exchange. The straight scan is far from flat or grey in my opinion.

    pentaxuser

  4. #4
    ChristopherCoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Armpit of Texas
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,190
    Images
    28
    So I went back and filed out the negative carrier a little more. I was trying to avoid filing it to the point that I saw sprocket holes, but I guess I failed at that too.

    This one was done with 2 seconds at a filter 0 instead of 00, and then i burned his right arm for +4 seconds. Then 8 seconds at filter 5, and I think I burned his arm in a little with filter 5 too, but I don't remember how much. Obviously it was too much.

    Its getting better. I left my darkroom set up, so I'll try some more burning and dodging in areas in the morning.


    Music5006w by ChristopherCoy, on Flickr

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Central Florida, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,919
    I like it! Now it's clearly a dirty border!

    By the way.... I don't like to think that you 'failed'. It was a "work in progress." That's what I think of less-than-perfect prints.
    Develop, stop, fix.... wait.... where's my film?

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,602
    Often it can help to take a break and come back with fresh eyes - especially when you're just starting out. Sometimes when you come back fresh it is easier to notice things in the print that need fixing/adjustment. It can also sometimes help to hang the print upside down. When you do that, some of the familiarity of the subject is removed, at least for a short time, and this can make it easier to focus on tonal relationships. Tonal relationships that are "illogical" (in the case above - both arms in sun but one is way darker), and other things that need adjustment, will tend to jump out at you a little more than while you're hard at work printing.

    And don't be afraid of going through some paper and taking time to come to the final print. This is totally normal at any skill level. And the end result is worth the effort and time.

    Just a few tips unrelated to split grade printing.

  7. #7
    ChristopherCoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Armpit of Texas
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,190
    Images
    28
    Quote Originally Posted by tkamiya View Post
    I like it! Now it's clearly a dirty border!

    By the way.... I don't like to think that you 'failed'. It was a "work in progress." That's what I think of less-than-perfect prints.


    Yeah, I actually kinda like it. The sprockets bother me less and less as I look at it.

  8. #8
    Bill Burk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    3,191
    Images
    46
    I like it! The dirty border looks good now, make sure to knock off any burrs with steel wool and if you have matt black paint, touch up the shiny edges now.

    The final (so far) looks like it's printed down a bit more than I would have liked.

    I liked the second variant, and would have only reduced the contrast from that print to make the arms a little less "hot" while holding the ear as-is.

  9. #9
    Willie Jan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Best/The Netherlands
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,910
    Images
    49
    In the past I also did some split grade tests. But afterwards i decided to first get my negatives 100% and that i understand measuring light. I got a developer for life (my own created pyrocat) and when I finished all that, it almost had no problems with printing these on grade 2. Sure split grade can help you a little more on that point, but it will not save a ruined negative... I do not want to say that your negs are no good, but want to say that the picture depends on a lot more than only the last phase. So try to adjust all the parameters to the best values, and stick to that.
    keep on the good work!

  10. #10
    ChristopherCoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Armpit of Texas
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,190
    Images
    28

    I tried split grade again, and filed my carrier...

    Quote Originally Posted by Willie Jan View Post
    I do not want to say that your negs are no good, but want to say that the picture depends on a lot more than only the last phase. So try to adjust all the parameters to the best values, and stick to that.
    keep on the good work!


    Wow. You hit all the points. Perhaps I should hang my camera up and find another hobby, because you basically just said I don't know how to do anything.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin