Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,497   Posts: 1,543,066   Online: 876
      
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 22 of 22
  1. #21
    Newt_on_Swings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    NYC
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,873
    I was testing some Kodaline paper the other day, and it had really really long exposures. The included data sheet stated that it was for mainly contact printing or reproduction of halftone images, though the box I had was 11x14. So it really depends on the paper, and as long as the image forms to your liking you are fine. I havent had a chance to try lith printing, but as of what I read their exposures are also very very long.

  2. #22
    baachitraka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Bremen, Germany.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,352
    Quote Originally Posted by Thomas Bertilsson View Post
    Maybe 'overexposed' by some people's standards, but it could well be that OP gets exactly what they want this way.
    Many photographers rely on more exposure than box speed, as well as more developing time than recommended.
    Ralph Gibson comes to mind.
    Like APX, Fomapan indeed require more exposure at-least a stop when developed in Rodinal 1+50 to get the good shadow details. For me negatives are not that dense at all.

    I will test again this weekend with and without graded filter.
    OM-1n: Do I need to own a Leica?
    Rolleicord Va: Humble.
    Holga 120GFN: Amazingly simple yet it produces outstanding negatives to print.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin