Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 75,771   Posts: 1,670,937   Online: 1026
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 41 to 43 of 43
  1. #41
    Bill Burk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    4x5 Format
    I don't know, I didn't really double-check the math.

    The next numbers of seconds in third-stops according to an old Master light meter, 40 - 50 - 64 - 80 - 100

    Reciprocity failure is a factor to keep in mind.

    I also believe the idea that you get consistent steps using f/stop printing breaks down a little when you change paper grades.

    Because 1/3 stop "change" at Grade 2 is a gentle difference... While it's a rather dramatic difference at Grade 4.

    Still I'd prefer f/stop differences than 5 - 10 - 15 - 20 - 25

    p.s. I made the 11x14 print last night using Looten's 5 - 10 - 20 - 40 - 80, and it sort of caught me off guard. The vintage neg was kind of thin compared to my usual. I had to use f/22 to make that test strip.

  2. #42

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Oregon and Austria
    4x5 Format
    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Burk View Post

    I think percentage timing is mathematically the same as f/stop timing... Look at your counts and mine... They're identical! I call mine 1/3 stop and you call yours 30%
    Exactly! The only thing I don't have with percentages that you have with f-stop timing is the headache!

    As Bob points out, the percentages and the stops are not exactly equivalent (and reciprocity failure is always a factor at longer times), however percentages are consistent and flexible and have all the advantages and none of the drawbacks of f-stop timing. I have two sequences, 20% and 30%, that I use for test strips and have simply memorized them. No programming, no math, nothing but counting seconds.

    Seriously, it seems to me that so many f-stop timing schemes (and timers!) are overly-complicated for the task at hand. Percentages are easily figured and rounded, and I can just use my metronome to time with and watch my work. Plus I have the advantage that I can apply the same system to dodging and burning, which is rather difficult with f-stop timing (how do you dodge 1/3 stop anyway?).

    And, when scaling a print up or down, I can find a base exposure and then use the percentages I've recorded to figure a starting point for manipulations for the new size. I say starting point because different size prints often require very different approaches to get the same "feel."



  3. #43
    Bob Carnie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Med. Format RF
    When I worked in the 80s doing huge murals we worked with a mag formulation that considered reciprocity , and therefore once we established a set time at one magnification
    then we could calculate fstop differences without adjusting the timer unless in extreme changes.

    Quite frankly I cannot tell you all how this was done today as my mind is old and feeble.

    I am a strong proponent of keeping my times within 10 -18 seconds so that the math will work out in % 's, but since we all have different types of enlargers. and different types of negatives our times may vary.
    I do use three bulbs on my enlargers .. 75w, 150 w and a 250 ww depending on the negative therefore keeping my times to the sweet spot as well keeping in the middle areas of my apeture without going to the extremes.
    I have heard of some here doing 2 minute exposures which if find impractical.

    I also utilize ND to lower the power of my 11 x14 and 8 x10 enlargers so that I am almost always in the sweet spot.

    I just finished 4 different negatives for mural silver prints and was able to print at two stops down and between 12 and 16 seconds.
    This way I can use predictable % printing as some here suggest to do.
    Also I use glass carriers and will adjust the apeture once focused to change density if my time is in the sweet spot.

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin