Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,927   Posts: 1,556,821   Online: 849
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    144

    Ilford Multigrade Filters Lifespan

    Hello All,

    It has been a long time since I've been active on these boards, since I've been without a darkroom for nearly 14 years now. However, just recently got one setup and I'm starting back into it. I have two sets of Ilford Multigrade gel filters (the smaller size and 6x6) that I originally bought sometime in the early 1990's for use with my Aristo 4500 VC enlarging head. I rarely used the smaller size, but did use the larger ones for all my 4x5 printing. Does anyone know if these filters fade or otherwise wear out over the years? Would it be advisable to buy a new set?

    Thank you for any help provided.

    Best regards,
    Alan
    Regards,
    Alan Huntley
    www.silverscapephoto.com

  2. #2

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Daventry, Northamptonshire, England
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    7,047
    They do fade. In regular use( problem 1 - define regular?) Ilford seems to suggest replacement every 5 years or so. I am less sure about fading due solely to age. Deprived of UV i.e. in a box I'd have thought that normal daylight fade would be negligible.

    Try each of them on fresh paper with fresh dev and see if each grade gives a noticeably different and progressively more contrasty result.

    pentaxuser

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,861
    The stability of the dyes may depend on the storage conditions, but I think fading would be most heavily influenced by the amount of use rather than just age.

    Regardless, it might be a good idea to get a new set anyway, especially if you don't have the latest version. You can tell by looking at the 00 and 5 filters. In the more recent sets, the 00 is no longer yellow, but a more orange-ish colour, and the 5 doesn't look as "purple" anymore. And the newest Ilford papers are really optimized to work with the latest version of the filters.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    144
    Thanks for the quick replies!

    I wouldn't classify my filters as having heavy use because I was a graded paper only user up until about the mid-1990's. Therefore, at most my 6x6 set saw about 4 - 5 years of what I'd call low-to-moderate use. For the past 13 years or so, both sets have been stored in a cabinet drawer devoid of any light, in their respective original spiral thingy in the box, and in my house. I wouldn't imagine anything related to storage being an issue.

    @Michael R 1974 - the 00 and 5 filters in my sets are as you describe. I must have a later version rather than an earlier one.

    I think I'll proceed as pentaxuser suggested...I'll grab a known neg and print it through the various filter strengths that I would normally use, and then simply compare for expected contrast differences.

    Thanks, again,
    Alan

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    496
    How about 40-yr old Polycontast filters, Anyone? Stored in pitch-black area.
    Last edited by chip j; 01-23-2014 at 08:37 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    US
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    2,060
    Quote Originally Posted by chip j View Post
    How about 40-yr old Polycontast filters, Anyone?
    thread noted

  7. #7
    richard ide's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Markham, Ontario
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,216
    I would think that when a paper is re-formulated, that there might be a slightly different spectral sensitivity. I.E. example MG3/MG4 it would be important to use the newest filters matched to the paper. The difference might be slight, but using the correct filter values will eliminate another variable in the process. Perhaps Simon may comment on this. I know that analyzing filter values from MG2 to MG4 there is a slight difference. That is without taking fading into account.
    Richard

    Why are there no speaker jacks on a stereo camera?

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    213
    I had the same question not long ago:
    http://www.apug.org/forums/forum37/1...aded-what.html
    Following the majority opinion of responders, I bought a new set of filters. With ~35€ now out of my pocket I found that both in appearance and function the old ones (purchased 30 yrs ago) were identical to the new ones.

    +1 on the advice of pentaxuser. Make sure the other variables are known: fresh paper, fresh dev; remember that there is hardly any difference between grades 4 and 5.

  9. #9
    mr rusty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    lancashire, UK
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    629
    Images
    105
    A slightly OT comment - never try using alcohol or lens cleaning fluid on Ilford filters to clean them. You don't need to ask me how I know. Who needs grade 4.5 anyway !

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,863
    Dear Alan,

    The ILFORD Multigrade filters do fade over time, and especially related to actual use and should be replaced 5 years + but as always, test them and as long as they work OK then thats fine.

    The BIGGEST cause of replacement of filters though is handling not fading, darkrooms / wet fingers / not replacing them in the box / scratching....

    So HANDLE with care.

    Simon ILFORD Photo / HARMAN technology Limited :

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin