Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,701   Posts: 1,482,632   Online: 760
      
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    14

    Advice about use of the Split Light Zone VI Cold Light Head

    I purchased one of the last of the Zone VI 4x5 split light cold light head for an old Beseler 4x5 MCRX back in January 2004. At the same time I purchased a Metrolux II. I have been using it as a split light source for the past year and have had a number of frustrations using it. I wonder whether anyone has suggestions on ways to correct my frustrating experience.

    I have been using the light system as a totally split light source in the Zone VI system and the light output is quite weak. The enlarging times for the green (soft) light are very long if the aperture is more than 1 f/stop above wide open. If I combine the lights there is no way of knowing what filter grade one is using without doing elaborate testing with each paper type used. In addition since the sensor in the light head and connected to the timer is much more sensitive for blue light than the green light, when the lights are used together, the Metrolux timing is much shorter for the soft green light than it normally would be for the green alone. Therefore, I think it makes it extremely difficult to make fine adjustments in a systematic manner when the two lights are combined.

    The light is too weak to be able to accurately use the probe on the metrolux to compute changes in exposure time when enlarger height is changed. I have not attempted to use the probe as a densitometer yet because it doesn't automatically help you to assess filter grades or exposure times.

    I end up spending several hours printing one negative before I produce a good print and waste materials in the process. If it is a difficult negative it may take me several days to produce a satisfactory print. Obviously, this is frustrating and detracts from the enjoyment of the whole photographic experience.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Downers Grove Illinois
    Posts
    1,040
    I would call Calumet. I suspect a very dim green bulb is a malfunction. If they are both on full or the same, you should get a 2 contrast grade. If it is coming out more than 2 1/2 there is some thing wrong. 1/2 blue exposure and 1/2 green should be normal contrast.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,064
    I have the filter drawer Aristo cold light head using the V54 lamp (see my thread several threads below yours). I called Aristo and was told that the Dual bulb head is slower than the single bulb with filters. I am using Dupont filters trying a variety of papers, and the contrast response of different papers can be very different. I find Dupont MGIV to be the contrastiest, with a #.5 - #1 filter being near normal for me (my reference is Seagull G#2 graded). The lowest contrast paper is Seagull VC with the highest contrast I can get falling slightly short of Seagull G #4 graded. All of these papers are fiber, by the way.
    Also, with the filter drawer head, I live with long exposures.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin