Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,953   Posts: 1,522,764   Online: 978
      
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Buster6X6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    London Ontario Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    713
    Images
    43

    Rodagon verses Kodak Ektanon?

    I have Kodak Ektanon 161/ f4.5 enlarging lens which performs pretty good ( I have nothing to compare it with). I have gone trough several threads and looks to me a lot of people like the performance of a Rodagon lenses. Does anybody know how those two lenses compare? Would one be better then other? Any impute would be appreciated.

    Greg
    Looking is a gift, but seeing is power.

    Buster6X6

  2. #2
    edz
    edz is offline

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Munich, Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    685
    Quote Originally Posted by Buster6X6
    I have Kodak Ektanon 161/ f4.5 enlarging lens which performs pretty good ( I have nothing to compare it with).
    If I recall correctly they were acceptable but never great in their day. The 161mm is, I think, an extended triplett, perhaps even a Tessar (not sure). In the Kodak lineup they were the "budget" glass. The Ektars were, by contrast, among the best of their day but from today's perspective really half-a-century old state of the art--- and the art really has advanced since the war, especially since computers became widespread and economical. The Rodagons, compared to the Ektars, are better corrected, coated and represent a very different state of the technical lensmaking. If you are looking for "sharpeness" and contrast then you might want--- especially given the current market prices--- to pick up a Rodagon 150mm (or even the 135mm).
    Make a difference? I think so..
    Edward C. Zimmermann
    BSn R&D // http://www.nonmonotonic.net

  3. #3
    Jim Noel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,817
    Blog Entries
    1
    I agree fully with Ed. The Rodagons are the best around now. I used Kodak lenses for years. I have also been through Nikkors and Schneiders. All of these have been relegated to the For Sale box and I only use Rodagons in the darkroom.
    Jim

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Los Alamos, NM
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,043
    Go for the Rodagon. Although I am not acquainted with the specific lens, "Ektanon" was the trade name for Kodak's lesser quality lenses. Many were three element designs and not particularly sharp. Rodagon has long been Rodenstocks trade name for professional quality enlarging lenses

  5. #5
    Buster6X6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    London Ontario Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    713
    Images
    43
    Thanks every one for making decision easy for me. As I said I have been using Kodak for three years and not having anything to compare it with Kodak gave me acceptable results. But if I can do better sure worth a try. The Rodagon lenses are going for a song.

    Greg
    Looking is a gift, but seeing is power.

    Buster6X6



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin