Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,491   Posts: 1,542,949   Online: 858
      
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    RoBBo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    255
    Images
    8

    Fuji 135 f/4.5 vs EL-Nikkor 135 f/5.6

    I don't really care about the extra speed from the Fuji since they're both enlarger lenses and will be used in printing, and I can't imagine why I'd have it wide open ever.
    More so the quality differences between the two.
    Since I can get ahold of the Nikkor with a Beseler board for $95 or the Fuji for $10 (And have to get the board separately, another $20)
    Is there a major quality difference?
    I've used the Nikkor so I know its on the level of what I want, just really curious as if there's something wrong about the Fuji.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Japan
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,957
    Quote Originally Posted by RoBBo View Post
    I don't really care about the extra speed from the Fuji since they're both enlarger lenses and will be used in printing, and I can't imagine why I'd have it wide open ever.
    More so the quality differences between the two.
    Since I can get ahold of the Nikkor with a Beseler board for $95 or the Fuji for $10 (And have to get the board separately, another $20)
    Is there a major quality difference?
    I've used the Nikkor so I know its on the level of what I want, just really curious as if there's something wrong about the Fuji.
    What label does the Fuji lens have? If it's a Fujinon "EX" lens, it's the latest version of their lens, multi-coated, and damn good. I have a 90mm and a 50mm from this series for my enlarger, so I know the quality only to some extent.

    If it's Fujinon EP or ES, it means older with probably mono-coating, but still pretty good. If it's a Fujinar lens, just avoid it.

    Meanwhile, El Nikkor is what it is. If you like it, go for it. Or you might want to get both since the prices are pretty low.

    In general, based on my own experience, to me Fuji lenses tends to produce less contrasty and less grainy than Nikkor lenses. The way I desscribe is that the images produced with the Fuji lenses are rather quiet-toned, on the other hand, the ones with the Nikkor lenses, a bit wilder-toned. But you can't really see the difference if you are enlarging small, like 8x10" and maybe some lenses don't have these characterisitcs at all.

    But then you're getting a used enlarger lens, it also depends on the previous use of the lens.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3
    For medium format enlarger lenses, all the Fujinon with 4,5 aperture was ES series (4 elements). Top series was EX (latest and better) and EP (older than EX) with 6 elements construction and 5,6 aperture.
    Avoid ES series, in this case prefer the EL nikkor 5,6/135.
    With a Peak or Micromega focuser, the grain rendition with the Nikkor is top sharp.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Westport, MA.
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,058
    If the fuji is ex, grab that in a heartbeat. It's the sharpest enlarging lens i've ever used, at least mine is. Really nice lens.
    Otherwise go with the nikkor. I have an older 6 element nikkor, 90mm. It's okay but nothing to write home about. Atleast mine is..



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin