Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,872   Posts: 1,583,495   Online: 1019
      
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23
  1. #21

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    87
    Reason? Cause they're dirt cheap.

  2. #22
    Mark Fisher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Chicago
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,640
    Images
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by weasel View Post
    When I had my permanent darkroom I used two enlargers, an omega d2 for the big stuff, and a leitz focomat for 35.
    If I had the room I would do it again.
    Exactly the mix I have. My reasoning is that 35mm is a pain to work with and really requires a glass carrier and the Leitz enlarger is simply a pleasure to use!

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Los Alamos, NM
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,075
    Different sizes sometimes work better in different enlargers. My big enlarger is a bit dim and a bit awkward for 35mm, so I found a 35mm enlarger for that size and for the occasional 16mm frame. Somewhere along the line I got a Minox camera with its dedicated enlarger. I think I've only used it once, but it is the only way to print from Minox negatives.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin