Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,990   Posts: 1,524,144   Online: 1110
      
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    32

    Long enlarger lenses, boards w/ extension

    I am relatively new to enlarging. I've been working with a Beseler 23C II, enlarging 6x6 with an El-Nikkor 80/5.6 lens.

    Recently I tried 6x9, but found that the corners are vignetting. After reading a bit, I gathered that I needed a longer lens, so I bought an El-Nikkor 135mm lens.

    When I attached this to my enlarger, I couldn't get the image to focus. After more research, it turns out I need a lens board with extension.

    So now I've got a board with about 20mm of extension "cone", but it is still not enough! Don't know what's up with this lens. It

    On a whim, I attached my 80mm lens to the extended board, and now it seems to have better coverage. To my surprise, it still has room to focus as well.

    Any thoughts?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    279
    Traditionally the preferred focal length for 6x9 has been the 105mm lens, so maybe the 23CII wasn't designed with enough travel for a 135?

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    32
    When I think about it, getting more coverage with the extension and 80mm doesn't seem to make any sense.

    I think I either need a bigger "cone" or a 105mm lens.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Italia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,680
    Actually it makes sense if you aren't making really large [infinity] prints.

    Draw a triangle. At 80mm the width at the wide spot is so large. The more extension the wider the wide spot is.

  5. #5
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,134
    Quote Originally Posted by awldune View Post
    When I think about it, getting more coverage with the extension and 80mm doesn't seem to make any sense.

    I think I either need a bigger "cone" or a 105mm lens.
    I love 6x9, and agree you should pick up a 105.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    32
    Quote Originally Posted by Nick Zentena View Post
    Actually it makes sense if you aren't making really large [infinity] prints.

    Draw a triangle. At 80mm the width at the wide spot is so large. The more extension the wider the wide spot is.
    Yes, but I think the same effect is achieved by the focusing bellows.

    I'll have to see about a 105mm lens. The 135mm El-Nikkor lens I got was such a steal -- mislabeled Ebay listing, went for $9.

    I guess I can resell it to help finance the 105mm.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    229
    Images
    3
    When I had a similar problem with a Russian 105 mm lens I bought s set of 39 mm macro extension tubes from one of the FSU sellers on Ebay. They are designed to be used for thread mount Leicas or Leica copies which use the same diameter and thread as most enlarger lenses. IIRC a set of three or four tubes of various lengths cost me less than an extended lens board.

    As an added bonus the macro tubes came with instructions, in Russian, on how to take macro pictures with them as well as a table of focus distance and exposure settings.
    -------------------------------
    Peter Schauss



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin