Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,549   Posts: 1,544,659   Online: 815
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15
  1. #11
    Vaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Humboldt Co.
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    4,649
    Images
    40
    Quote Originally Posted by per volquartz View Post
    From 35mm to 8X10. I stretch the larger negs using black tape in the corners. They stay flat that way!
    I am into negative bondage also...

    Vaughn
    At least with LF landscape, a bad day of photography can still be a good day of exercise.

  2. #12
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,219
    Quote Originally Posted by RalphLambrecht View Post
    Per

    I like your approach, but the total depth of focus for a 35mm, 10x enlargement at f/5.6 is about 0.5 mm. A 2x enlargement of an 8x10 negative is about 0.7 mm at the same aperture. A little heat from the light source and the negative will 'pop' out of focus. A glass carrier is the only way to hold a negative flat.
    I agree with all that. Sometimes, when I'm in a hurry or doing shots of the kids or something, I don't want to use the glass carrier with 35mm. I'll measure my delta v on the enlarger column ( the distance the head needs to be moved up or down from the high to the low point on the negative). I punch that number into the focusing equation and have good results at f11 or f16. The key is focusing with the column and setting the head height exactly between the high and low spot without touching the lens stage 'focus' knob. (exactly like focusing the rear-standard of a view camera). Just stopping down to f16 or f11 and focusing on the high spot (center) won't work.

  3. #13
    Curt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Pacific Northwest
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,551
    Images
    15
    I have the ubiquitous Negaflat and for 5x7 the Zipper Glassless Stretching carrier with a cool name.
    Everytime I find a film or paper that I like, they discontinue it. - Paul Strand - Aperture monograph on Strand

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Los Alamos, NM
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,052
    I really like my glass negative holders, and I haven't had nearly the problems you describe. As noted above, the light source may make the problem worse. I use dichro heads, which are diffusion sources. I also accept the fact that I have to clear the glass frequently. (I use Windex and paper towels.) You also may just be in a dusty place. There are things you can do to reduce the dust. Sealing cracks, plastic sheeting in the right places, dust trapping mats at the entrance, lower traffic, etc. come to mind.

  5. #15
    John Bragg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Penwithick, Cornwall, U.K.
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    345
    Images
    9
    I used to print glassless and started using a universal double glass carrier in my Kaiser enlarger for two reasons. Sheer frustration at negatives popping during exposures and also it is the easiest way to print full frame without filing out a 35mm carrier.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin