Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,970   Posts: 1,523,525   Online: 844
      
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Naestved, DK
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,330

    Stepwedges for Dichroic VC calibration

    Hi all
    I'm close to have finished the shed in which Im about to install a darkroom and Im planing the next moves (Building tables for enlarges, countes and storage etc). I figured I will Calibrate my two enlarger with dichroic heads (Omega D3 and Durst AC707) as in "Way Beyond Monochrome". So Im in need of some stepwedges, right? Stouffer has some: T3110; TP12-31 and TP4X5-31. Question is which to get and do I need 31 steps or will 21 do?
    Best regards
    Send from my Electronic Data Management Device using TWOFingerTexting

    Technology distinquishable from magic is insufficiently developed

    Søren Nielsen
    Denmark

  2. #2
    RalphLambrecht's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    the villages .centralflorida,USA and Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,370
    Images
    1
    Soren

    31 spteps have more info and accuracy but they take longer to evaluate the data. 21 steps are enough, but you might want to use the step wedges for other tests and then 31 steps might be needed. So, I recommend a 31-step test tablet in the size of your negative. To save shipping costs, and you need one anyway some day. Also get a 31-step version in 4x5 for contact printing. Don't get the calibrated version of any step tablet. They are terribly expensive and all they offer is a list of accurately measured densities. You don't need that. get all test tablets as non-calibrated.

    Hope this helps.
    Regards

    Ralph W. Lambrecht
    www.darkroomagic.comrorrlambrec@ymail.com[/URL]
    www.waybeyondmonochrome.com

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Naestved, DK
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,330
    Hi Ralph
    Thank you for the very precise answer. re 31 vs 21 steps, I think I read something somewhere about 21 steps being equal to half stops and 31 to 1/3 stops, commends on that?
    Best regards
    Send from my Electronic Data Management Device using TWOFingerTexting

    Technology distinquishable from magic is insufficiently developed

    Søren Nielsen
    Denmark

  4. #4
    RH Designs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Yorkshire Dales, England
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    657
    Images
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by Soeren View Post
    I think I read something somewhere about 21 steps being equal to half stops and 31 to 1/3 stops, commends on that?
    That's correct for the Stouffer wedges, yes. We use the 21 step one for Analyser / ZoneMaster calibration. Each step is half a stop and corresponds to 15 ISO(R) contrast units.
    Regards,
    Richard.

    RH Designs - My Photography

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Vermont
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    37
    One advantage of 1/3 stop steps is that corresponds to the steps in standard ISO film speeds, right? I don't actually see how that would matter, especially for calibrating paper processing.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin