Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,701   Posts: 1,482,635   Online: 777
      
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21
  1. #11

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,933
    from what I've read on the web

    the 80/5.6 is a 6 element design, the 75/4 a 4 element. 6 element designs are deemed better.

    I do have a 80/4 Schneider, a Fujinon EX 90/5.6 (and had a no-name Aston 75/3.5) I did a test and my order of preference turned out to be the Fujinon then the Schneider just ahead of the Astron (which was very surprising to me!) The Schneider cost me considerable $$$!. The Schneider has some nice user features like the aperture lever that alternates between your working ap and wide open. Good for focusing then stopping the lens down to the correct aperture without looking at it. It also can dis-engage click stops but I've never used that. The Fujinon can be turned when in the lensboard so that the highlighted aperture display faces you. Handy if the lens tightens and the ap scale doesn't face the front! I gave the Astron lens away with an enlarger but I was surprised how close to the others it was... I presumed it was similar to the bottom of a old style coke bottle

  2. #12
    Ole
    Ole is offline
    Ole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bergen, Norway
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    9,280
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    31
    Once again, I'm happy with my Meopta 80mm Anaret-S. New price is still less than you would pay for an old "major brand" on eBay, quality is very, very good. They have a reputation for being very variable, but the "-S" version generally has better quality check than the plain version.

    I also have a 60mm Componon, a 50mm Anaret-S, and 150, 108, and 210mm Rodagons. I have compared print from the 80mm Anaret-S with prints made with a EL-Nikkor, and insist that mine were sharper and clearer.
    -- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
    Norway

  3. #13
    skahde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    425
    Images
    4
    I am a happy user of the 4,5/75mm Fujinon EX. Visibly outperforms my old non-S Componon 5.6/80mm from 1972. Covers 6x6 with no visible fall-off.

    best

    Stefan

  4. #14
    blansky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Wine country in Northern California
    Posts
    5,029
    Karen,

    People have mentioned the Schneider Componon, and when buying one, make sure that it is componon not componAR, or something else which is an inferior lens.

    Also there is a Rodenstock lens that is close to the Rodagon in spelling that is inferior.

    So as stated before, what you want is Componon or Rodagon.

    Something to watch for.

    Michael

  5. #15
    Ka
    Ka is offline

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    New York
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    215
    Thanks, Michael.

    I'm going to bid on the Schneider Componon (still looking one with an S designation) and Rodenstock Rodagon 80mm f 5.6 enlarger lens.

    That Rodagon has a buy it now... perhaps I should just get it, I loath waiting.

    Is there a noticable difference between the Componon and Rodagon?

  6. #16
    blansky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Wine country in Northern California
    Posts
    5,029
    Not according to people who know a lot more than me.

    I would probably try to find these lenses in F4 rather than 5.6.

    Would someone else chime in here.

    I think I bought mine used for something like $80. (Schneider Componon 80mm F4) two years ago.



    MIchael

  7. #17
    Ka
    Ka is offline

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    New York
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    215
    Ok, your word is good enough for me.. I wait for an 80mm f/4.

  8. #18

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    965
    Images
    58
    As far as I know, the 80mm 5.6 are good lenses... I own a nikkor 80 5.6, but so far have only printed 7x7's with it. It's definately sharp in those enlargement ratios.
    BTW, I use it at f 11, 2 stops down from wide open.

    On the other hand, a professor once told me to use a 80/4 componon-s at 11 as well, just as I should the 50/2.8 at f/8, not 5.6

    As an irrelevant piece of extremely biased info: I like my 80 nikkor better than the 80 componon-s I used in college. Mostly because the nikkor is mine.

    If I recall correctly, I paid less than 50 for it on ebay, and it came with the adaptor for leica 39mm thread and a locking nut.

  9. #19
    Ka
    Ka is offline

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    New York
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    215
    Still trying to win a bid on a Compnon S or Roganon S... but saw a Rodenstock Omegaron 75mm F4.5 lens for very little, and wondered if it were comperable to the above 80mm "s" lenses.

  10. #20

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    1,632
    Images
    5
    Ka,

    The Omegaron would probably give very satisfactory performance in most cases. It is not, however, Rodenstock's top-grade lens. For a long-term investment, I'd stick with Rodagons, Componons, and El-Nikkors.

    Konical

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin