Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,929   Posts: 1,585,219   Online: 793
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
  1. #1
    Krzys's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD, Australia
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    506
    Images
    11

    A quick question on exposure and contrast

    If I find the exposure time for a print at grade 2 and then want to increase the contrast grade will I then have to increase the exposure time as well?

  2. #2
    Kevin Caulfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,109
    Blog Entries
    5
    Images
    56
    It depends on what sort of filtration you are using. Sometimes you need to increase the exposure time for grades 4 and 5.

  3. #3
    Krzys's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD, Australia
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    506
    Images
    11
    The color filter dials on my LPL color condenser enlarger. I was just wondering if there was a need for increased exposure then is there some kind of rule to work by.

  4. #4
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,435
    Images
    148
    Quote Originally Posted by Krzys View Post
    The color filter dials on my LPL color condenser enlarger. I was just wondering if there was a need for increased exposure then is there some kind of rule to work by.
    Colour filter dials on a condenser enlarger ??? Never heard of that before. Colour heads are all diffuser.

    Depends which system of filtration your using, single filter - then yes exposure definitely needs increasing, dual filtration you may need a slight shift in exposure as you ioncresae the contrast.

    Ian

  5. #5
    Krzys's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD, Australia
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    506
    Images
    11
    You are right about the condenser...I got confused by the C7700 model name

  6. #6
    Mike Wilde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Misissauaga Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,939
    Images
    29
    There are ways to calibrate a dichroic head for a constant expossure for a tone, when shifting grades. It relies on using a step wedge, and printing about 16 patches. I usually print them 2x2" so they can easily be pasted into a record book.

    If you have one a step wedge at hand, shoot me a PM and I will dig up and post the proceedure to you.

    Basically the end result is you dial in extra Y&M (kind like ND in colour with all three filters using CYM) to decrease the amount of light getting through the filters when you are printing though thin flilter settings.
    my real name, imagine that.

  7. #7
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,435
    Images
    148
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Wilde View Post
    There are ways to calibrate a dichroic head for a constant expossure for a tone, when shifting grades. It relies on using a step wedge, and printing about 16 patches. I usually print them 2x2" so they can easily be pasted into a record book.

    If you have one a step wedge at hand, shoot me a PM and I will dig up and post the proceedure to you.

    Basically the end result is you dial in extra Y&M (kind like ND in colour with all three filters using CYM) to decrease the amount of light getting through the filters when you are printing though thin flilter settings.
    Ilford have already done that and the result is their Dual filtration recommendations

    Ian

  8. #8

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Daventry, Northamptonshire, England
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    7,157
    So the answer, krzys, is to look up the dual fitration on the manufacturer's tables that come with the paper. Most makes have such filtration tables but I suspect some may have been more meticulous than others in arriving at them. However I have found that while within a short range of grades say 2-3.5 the same exposure produces the same or very close to the same exposure results, the variation gets larger for the more extreme grades.

    Mike's idea of using a step wedge to caibrate your own enlarger and paper makes sense to me, although I have never done it. If I have understood Ralph Lambrecht's tables on his site Darkroom Magic he is saying that not only is the Ilford and Agfa dual filtration different from what he believes to be correct but more crucially that dual filtration, no matter how well you have calibrated for it does not ensure same exposure. He helpfully gives another table which states what the increase and decrease in exposure should be in I think 1/12ths of a stop for changes in grade.

    I am hoping all will be more fully revealed when I get his book which I have ordered.

    So dual filtration values and same exposure may be good enough for the middle range of grades. Alternatively even with a colour head you can dial out all the filters and fit an Ilford under the lens filter system which is 12 filters for grades 00 to 5. I think that Ilford claim that each filter is so designed to give the same exposure up to grade 3.5 and then you double exposure for grades 4,4.5 and 5.


    It is as you will see quite a complicated subject - well it is for me :

    pentaxuser

  9. #9
    Mainecoonmaniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,196
    Images
    6

    It depends....

    Quote Originally Posted by Krzys View Post
    If I find the exposure time for a print at grade 2 and then want to increase the contrast grade will I then have to increase the exposure time as well?
    It depends. If you printing in MG paper, probably. But it always better to do a test print. When you change contrast, try to print for your highlights and see how the shadows look. If you want minimal hassle on test printing, I used to use Ilford paper and filters. If I remember correctly, you don't have to change printing times within grades 0-3, but if you go from those grades to grade 4 and above, you double your print time. If you go the other way, you half your print time. I think those filters from Ilford have neutral density filter to compensate for the different grades. I use a color head to print BW and I always make another test print to check on range of tones.

  10. #10
    MattKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Delta, British Columbia, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    12,953
    Images
    60
    If you are using the dual filter approach, as at least one other poster has said, it depends.

    The dual filter tables are all referenced to a particular tone of grey. So they are accurate for that tone, but that may not be the tone that you care about the most.

    I would still use them as a good starting point though.
    Matt

    “Photography is a complex and fluid medium, and its many factors are not applied in simple sequence. Rather, the process may be likened to the art of the juggler in keeping many balls in the air at one time!”

    Ansel Adams, from the introduction to The Negative - The New Ansel Adams Photography Series / Book 2

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin