Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,771   Posts: 1,516,526   Online: 793
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    NER
    NER is offline

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Davis, California
    Posts
    78
    Images
    1

    Kearsarge 503 vs. Gralab 900

    I want a new timer for my Super Chromega F Dichroic II. I don't like the Omega timer I have because: (1) it has no digital readout or audible clicks; and (2) at the end of any cycle, the light fades away vs. terminating abruptly. I need a timer with a rating of 1000 watts because I have no power relay, and don't want an extra device on the counter if I can avoid it. The Kearsarge 503 is rated at 1000 watts. I think the Gralab 900 will swallow up to 1200 watts. I used a digital Gralab for years with my 4x5 enlarger and was very happy with it, but I've never used Kearsarge timers. I hear they're excellent. The Gralab I have won't handle the load for the big enlarger. Any thoughts on how these timers compare? What digitial timers are others using for the same or comparable 8x10 enlargers? Any recommendation? Thanks.

  2. #2
    Jeffrey A. Steinberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Scarsdale, NY
    Posts
    296
    I have a different model Kearsarge (I think its the 201 or 301--its in storage while my darkroom is under construction).

    I have to tell you its the best timer I have bought. You won't go wrong. The only thing that bugged me was that the silkscreened numbers were not fully formed when I got it. Functionally, its great. I would go with the Kearsarge again.
    --Jeffrey

    ______________________________________________
    Jeffrey Steinberg, K2MIT
    Scarsdale, NY

    www.jsteinbergphoto.com (my avocation)
    www.reversis.com (my vocation)

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,530
    I got me a Kearsarge 301 used on ebay, but it was like new, the guy even sent it in the original box. I have to say, it is a great timer, simple and looks to be built like a tank. I dont think you can go wrong with it, if ianything it looks better made than the omega.

  4. #4
    NER
    NER is offline

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Davis, California
    Posts
    78
    Images
    1
    I didn't think anyone would ever respond to this question! Thank you both. I do think the 301 is a good timer, but I don't think it can pull 1000 watts. I believe the rating for it is only half what I need for my enlarger. Am I incorrect in that belief? Thank you again.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,530
    yep, 500 watts is the max for the 301

  6. #6
    JackRosa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Oklahoma, USA
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    190
    Images
    8
    I have the exact same Omega head and use a Lektra TM-8 timer. You can buy one on eBay for under $100
    Jack Rosa

  7. #7
    JackRosa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Oklahoma, USA
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    190
    Images
    8

    CAUTION !!!

    i) I believe 1,000 Watts is the minimum for the Omega head you (and I) have. A timer with a rating of only 1,000 Watts may be pushing the capabilities of the unit to its boundaries. I would recommend against this.

    ii) The Lektra TM-8 timer has a rating of 1,500 Watts.

    iii) The Kearsarge timers are great timers. I own a 201 and used to own a 301. I would not pay the extra $$ for the 301 or a more-expensive model.

    iv) You may want to consider buying a contactor from Kearsarge for under $200. It will handle the load from your Omega head regardless of what timer you are using. In so doing, you open your horizon to any timer of any rating, as the contactor is the devicde that handles the load.

    v) The Kearsarge 201 and 301 have provision for a foot switch to turn the enlarger on/off. The Lektra TM-8 timer (as well as other Lektra timers) have provision for two(2) footswitches: one for timing exposure and one for focusing. I find this feature to be extremely useful.

    If I can be of additional help, let me know. If your final choice is a Kearsarge, I can provide you with contact info for twhat I believe to be the only Kearsarge distributor - a really good guy to deal with. Finally, if your choice is a Kearsarge, I recommend you buy new - these units are laboratory-type units and don't take well to a lot of 'beating'. I have seen used units that look great on the outside but do not function properly. Au contraire, the Lektra units are built like tanks and will continue to work in spite of the most hostile environment/treatment they have been put though.
    Jack Rosa

  8. #8
    JackRosa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Oklahoma, USA
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    190
    Images
    8
    Norman: I visited your website ... beautiful work!
    Jack Rosa

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    California
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    60
    I have a Kearsarge 403. THe only features it offers above the 301 is 10 memory preset locations. For sequential timing ( like in burn in.....).

  10. #10
    NER
    NER is offline

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Davis, California
    Posts
    78
    Images
    1
    Thanks, Jack. I have written you off-line to followup on this discussion.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin