Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,536   Posts: 1,544,219   Online: 767
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    rjr
    rjr is offline
    rjr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Mosel, SW Germany
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    409
    Images
    4

    Handling a large contrast - will pre-flash help?

    2 years ago I took a set of pictures in the London tube, Canary Wharf station.

    I scanned two of these with my universities LS2000:
    http://rohleder.gmxhome.de/nmz/

    The actual negatives are tack sharp - which made me chuckle, it was freehand at 1/8s or 1/15s with a soviet FED5 and a Heliar 4,5/15 on dirt-cheap film,something called "Polypan F" shot at 50ASA and developed in ID11 without actual testing. No wall, no tripod nothing. The weight of the FED saved the shot... but the lens mounted misaligned, resulting in vignetting in upper left and lower right.

    Somehow I like the images.

    BUT.

    The contrast is extreme - from the dark unlit cavern of the subway to the bright june sky outside. I repeatedly failed to print the negatives, either the dome is blank or the shadows are just black.

    But the "information" is in the film, there is texture in both shadows and lights... how can I handle them?

    Tonight I started fiddling around with a pre-flash technique - but it didn´t actully solve it. And I don´t plan to mess around with masking techniques.

    Suggestions?

    Whatever - Thanks! :-)
    Tschüss,
    Roman

  2. #2
    galyons's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Posts
    273
    Images
    2
    Roman,
    Nice shots! I would suggest you try split grade printing, if you are using VC paper. Do a soft exposure test strip with a 00 or 01 VC filter or max Y on a dichroic head tested for the highlight level that you want. Then a hard exposure test strip, (on a base soft exposure selected in step 1) with 5 VC filter or max M to get the contrast and shadows that you want. Then print the soft and hard exposures on your work print. You may still need to preflash or some local dodging and/or burning.

    This will allow you a large range of control on a high contrast neg.


    Cheers,
    Geary

  3. #3
    rjr
    rjr is offline
    rjr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Mosel, SW Germany
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    409
    Images
    4
    Geary,

    thanks for your reply, but I already tried manual splitgrade, even in coincidence with pre-flash - the print still went wrong, it´s not enough..

    I just didn´t want to mention how desperate I am with these negatives... splitgrade is always my last resort. ,-)

    I don´t know what was on my mind then - unknown lens, new film, untested procedures and an excursion to London... young and stupid. <g>
    Tschüss,
    Roman

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,530
    Use the Sterry method or what Kachel used to call SLIM (selective latent image manipulation) Make the print so that it prints to your taste in the highlights, you will probably have all blacks with not detail in the shadows at this point. Before you put it in the developer, you put the print in a .01% pot ferricyanide solution.
    You wil have to make some tesing for the best amount of time you should leave it in the bath.
    When done before developing, bleaching has the opposite effect. It reduces the contrast instead of increasing it.

    Hope this helps, OTOH, a couple of the prints looked fine to me......

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,627
    Images
    154
    Quote Originally Posted by Jorge
    Use the Sterry method or what Kachel used to call SLIM (selective latent image manipulation) Make the print so that it prints to your taste in the highlights, you will probably have all blacks with not detail in the shadows at this point. Before you put it in the developer, you put the print in a .01% pot ferricyanide solution.
    You wil have to make some tesing for the best amount of time you should leave it in the bath.
    When done before developing, bleaching has the opposite effect. It reduces the contrast instead of increasing it.

    Hope this helps, OTOH, a couple of the prints looked fine to me......
    What does this do to the developer?

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,530
    Quote Originally Posted by Thomassauerwein
    What does this do to the developer?
    nothing, the amount left on the print has such a low concentration that it wont affect your developer. Of course, if you want to, you can wash the print before it goes in the developer, it wont make a difference.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,627
    Images
    154
    "Thanks" Jorge what a cool cheap and easy tool. I've never heard of it or thought of it.

  8. #8
    rjr
    rjr is offline
    rjr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Mosel, SW Germany
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    409
    Images
    4
    Jorge,

    "Hope this helps, OTOH, a couple of the prints looked fine to me......"

    These are scans from the negative, not prints, it was easier to handle the contrast with Photoshop... the variations are a leftover from a short critique round regarding "how would you crop it".

    Tonight I´ll try another pre-flash + splitgrade, if failing I´ll give the Sterry method a try - don´t have ferricyanid at hand at the moment (but the latest "raw stuff" order already arrived at a friend of mine), I´ll use a very dilute stock of bleach I already have set up at hand from a Sepia toning kit ("Classic"/Foma). Bleach is bleach.

    Thanks guys. I´ll come back with either failure or success. ;-)
    Tschüss,
    Roman

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    468
    As above, I think you'll be very happy with split contrast printing this neg... I would personally print for the highlights and skip the prefash. (Unless you're careful, you're only adding mud to the highlights). If it gave you trouble before, eliminate the variables and try to do just one thing with it.

    Looking at the link you supplied, I think you can fix the contrast wonderfully. (Either way, it should be a dynamic, contrasty scene... It suits it... )

    joe

    p.s. Post a scan once you get it, I'm sure everyone would be interested in seeing where it went...

  10. #10
    Les McLean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Northern England on the Scottish border
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,610
    The method of contrast control the Jorge described is also known as latent image bleaching, it bleaches the shadows but not the highlights when the undeveloped print is places in the very dilute bleach solution. I have used this technique many moons ago and I did write an article for the now defunct Darkroom User, I'll look for it in my old files and post it to the articles forum.

    Meanwhile you could try my preferred method of dealing with the contrast problems you describe, post flashing where you deliberately give exposure to white light and fog the paper. If you want a copy of ther article I published drop me an email and I'll send it by return. email address is les@lesmcleanphoto.demon.co.uk
    "Digital circuits are made from analogue parts"
    Fourtune Cookie-Brooklyn May 2006

    Website: www.lesmcleanphotography.com

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin