Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,301   Posts: 1,536,146   Online: 836
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Eastern Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,595

    Kodachrome or Ektachrome for cross processing.

    A belated HAPPY ANNIVERSARY to Sean,APUG,and all the wonderful folks I have encountered through this remarkable meeting place. Even the non-analogers I have shown the site to are amazed by the depth of knowledge and incerdible "humanity" exibited on a universal scale by our members. ROCK ON!!!
    Since I was unable to shoot something "special" to mark the occasion I thought today I would try a bit of cross processing using my "new" Olympus XA-2. After digging through the freezer I discovered 2 ice coated boxes of slide film.A roll of Kodachrome 25 and one of Ektachrome 100. Just wondering which one would give me the best effect and how should I rate them as both are way past their expiration date.

    Thanks Much,
    Mike

  2. #2
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,236
    Images
    20
    Ektachrome. I don't know that you would get anything by cross-processing Kodachrome in C-41, though it can be processed as B&W neg (which would be a terrible waste of K-25, in my opinion!).
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  3. #3
    jd callow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Milan
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,002
    Images
    117
    The ektachrome. Rate it as labeled, bracket toward over exposure. Remember that it can only handle 3-5 stops of information so don't expect there to be any or much highlight or shadow detail. If the film is EPP/EPN than it will suffer from blue/yellow cross over.

    If the film is really old, where the dmax has sliped a full stop or more, you can hammer it with light (2 stops of over exposure) and get interesting effects. This would require you to have two rolls, one for testing the other for real or to do a snip test.

    *

  4. #4
    George Papantoniou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Athens
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    986
    Images
    110
    I'm pretty confident the Kodachrome won't show anything interesting in C-41... Maybe some kind of monochrome, wrongly developed image...

    I underexpose EPP for cross-processing in C-41. It seems (to me) the negatives are easier to print (on an enlarger) like that. Of course, the shadow detail is inexistent.

    If you want shadow detail, follow the instructions in the previous posts. Then you'll get negs that are going to be somewhat harder to print (blocked highlights).

  5. #5
    jd callow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Milan
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,002
    Images
    117
    The bleach step of c41 will, if I understand the film correctly, remove any image on kodachrome.

    Denser crossed negs may be somewhat harder to print (longer and can exhibit some blooming where light meets dark), but far easer to colour correct. They also have great saturation. From my experience I have found that under exposure produces stronger colour casts and cross over, and 'correct' exposure to overexposure more saturation.

    If you push the film (around 2-stops) you can get a colour Kodalith like neg (that is all but impossible to cc) and if you pull it you can get a really saturated neg with some of the contrast controlled.

    Techniques I use with some success is to slightly over expose and under develop and or to be selective about what highlights are included in the frame. Shooting anything with a preponderance of sky will generally produce either silhouettes or a large swatch of white. I also do on camera cc when the film exhibits strong colour casts (e.g. a magenta filter for kodak's e100 films), but I wouldn't suggest this without first experimenting.

    *

  6. #6
    Donald Qualls's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    North Carolina, USA (transplanted from Seattle)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,845
    Above is correct -- Kodachrome has no dye couplers, dyes and couplers are provided in the three (!) color development stages, along with reversal exposures. Developing in normal B&W chemisty (and removing the remjet layer) will result in pretty ordinary B&W negatives with the colloidal silver yellow filter layer still intact. Developing in B&W reversal type first dev may remove the filter layer. Developing in C-41 or E-6 chemistry will bleach away any silver image without leaving dyes (due to lack of couplers), and leave the film blank.
    Photography has always fascinated me -- as a child, simply for the magic of capturing an image onto glossy paper with a little box, but as an adult because of the unique juxtaposition of science and art -- the physics of optics, the mechanics of the camera, the chemistry of film and developer, alongside the art in seeing, composing, exposing, processing and printing.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Eastern Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,595

    Thanks all.

    I learn something new each time I post a question on the APUG site.
    Mike

  8. #8
    titrisol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Rotterdam
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,671
    Images
    8
    Ektachrome 200 exposed as 125/100 and coss processed works for me.
    Mama took my APX away.....

  9. #9
    jd callow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Milan
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,002
    Images
    117
    All of the images in the New Orleans series I have on ebay were shot on e200. I used a 40cc magenta filter on camera and rated the film from 50-100.

    I think it is excellent film for crossprocessing.

    *

  10. #10

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Woonsocket, RI USA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,725
    As a side note, if Mike wasn't aware, Kodachrome 25 has been discontinued. AFAIK, there's no current ISO 25 color film being made. I recently saw this eBay auction for five boxes of Kodachrome 25 and three boxes of Kodachrome 64, all expired but claimed to be stored frozen. It ended at $162.50. Subtracting out the street price of the Kodachrome 64 ($6.49 at B&H), that means the Kodachrome 25 sold for $28.61 per roll, plus shipping.

    All of which is just to elaborate on David's comment: Doing wacky experiments with Kodachrome 25 (even if they might work, which cross-processing as C-41 won't) is a waste! If you don't want it, sell it on eBay -- or better yet, give it to me!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin