Yeah. I have read that also, in Keepers of the light perhaps, or maybe in another book... I'd love to print the same negative using both techniques and compare the results in person. Have fun toning your VDBs!
Originally Posted by Ole
There are many ways to answer your question.
However, when you cut to the quick a kallitype toned with pallaidum or platinum has the exact same look, including color, tonal range and depth, as a regualr Pt./Pd. print. This is due to the fact that the toned kallitype has become for all practical purposes the same as a regular Pt./Pd. print, i.e. the image is made up primarily of pallaidum or platinum metal. I had some question about this when I first started toning kallitype prints with pallaidum and platinum, but some experiments in bleaching an re-development that I did a few years ago, plus more recent analyis of my toned kallitypes by a the photo conservation laboratory of the Getty museum, has shown without any doubt that toning results in metal replacement.
Bottom line then is this. A kallitype toned with palladium or platinum has the same look, and for all practical purposes the same permanence, as prints made with the regular Pt./Pd. process.
Why then would still use the much more expensive regular Pt./Pd. process to make pallaidium and platinum metal images instead of toning kallitypes. Well, the work flow of the two printing methods is different and some, though not me, find that the regular Pt./Pd. method is faster. Another consideration is snob appeal, very important if you hope to sell your prints in galleries. The term platinum print means something to many potential collectors, a Pt/Pd toned kallitype or vandyke usually does not.
Palladium or platinum toned vandykes are similar, but not exactly like regular Pt./Pd. and kallitype prints. Compared to kallitypes they always retain a more brown look, which, though not unattractive in the least, has a different look from regular Pt./Pd. prints.
Hope this information is useful to you.
Originally Posted by Michael Slade
You can get really sweet purply tones with gold borax toning.
you sound like me.
I was/am/have been in a simliar situation. keep in mind any of these comments just come from my testing/experience and its just that, only mine and not expert at all, nor all that extensive.
I started out doing VDB prints and then started fooling with toning them.
You mentioned about "aren't you able, really, to make a pt/pd print in a bit shorter, quicker, easier and cheaper method when you tone a VDB/Kallitype instead of doing the traditional pt/pd method?"
my experience with this is that toning a VDB with either palladium/platinum gives a distinctly different print in tone and appearance than a traditional platinum/palladium... The control is no where near as workable with VDBs and toning as doing a straight pt/pd I found. Plus you just seem to get a "nicer" print in my mind with a straight palladium/platinum. again, completely personal opinion. Ive taken many negatives and printed the same negative in a bunch of different variations: straight palladium, straight VDB, selenium toned VDB, Gold toned VDB, platinum toned VDB, palladium toned VDB... when they were all done and dry it was really eye opening to seem them side by side. So different and such diversity... all coming from the same negative.
One thing I really have found is its completely personal opinion... Ive shown many people the different prints and some people just love straight VDBs, some prefer palladium prints, some just hate them out right and wonder why I dont use a digital camera.
Im partial to Palladium prints but, I personally still love VDB prints.... in fact I prefer them over the toned ones.
Although the one really cool thing is like sandy has likely stated you are able to create a really archival print by toning van dyke browns.
I dont know even a little about Kallitypes but I recently printed off Sandys article and really wanna try them out at some point in the future.
guess one of the things I found was most useful was just experimenting with all the different possibilities then seeing which one I was most pleased with.
hope that helps.... I have very limited experience.. but that limited experience is with VDBs, toning them, and with some palladium printing.
Originally Posted by Michael Slade
Thanks to everyone for your well thought out responses. I am very appreciative to this forum for the depth and breadth of knowledge here. It is very reassuring to know that this resource is so experienced and the members here are so willing to share their experiences.
Sandy, your articles are what is quickly becoming my reference material for my alt. printing. I appreciate your hard work and dedication to it.
Scootermn, your insights are also very helpful. I would love to see the variations of printing technique from the same negative. I am currently working on some work that is showing prints that were originally in color and presenting them next to a b&w version. It is very interesting to see the differences between the two. It is making me re-think how I see the world and how I am pre-visualizing my images. Very educational in my instance, I know that your expeirences with the various printing techniques are as eye opening.
I'll be back soon...I'm making an order of some chemistry tonight I think (possibly on the phone Monday).
Thanks to all!
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)