Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,880   Posts: 1,520,483   Online: 835
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    155

    Double coating & esthetic issues

    I've read with interest about double coating pt/pd prints. I understand it increases dmax and produces better shadow details. May I ask if folks here do it as a regular thing? Or is it done only for certain images? What are the important points to note when double coating?

    I'm fairly new to Pt/Pd. From my very brief experience so far, I find that much of the learning curve is in technical issues rather than visual (esthetic) ones. Lots of problems (coating, drop counts, humidity, fog, graininess, clearing, paper suitability, etc.) came up in the initial stage. I assume more technical problems will surface along the way. But when an image turns out right, it looks right. Seems easy enough; little or no manipulation needed. Mainly tone, contrast, and feel of the print. Somehow I think I am being naive thinking this way? What am I missing?

    Thanks.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Greenville, SC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,813
    Images
    5
    I double coat routinely, both Pt./Pd. and kallitype. However, I dilute the second coating 1:1 with water. So for an 8X10 print I would use 2ml of the sensitizer for the first coating, then dilute the 1 ml with water for the second coating.

    Sandy


    Quote Originally Posted by eggshell
    I've read with interest about double coating pt/pd prints. I understand it increases dmax and produces better shadow details. May I ask if folks here do it as a regular thing? Or is it done only for certain images? What are the important points to note when double coating?

    I'm fairly new to Pt/Pd. From my very brief experience so far, I find that much of the learning curve is in technical issues rather than visual (esthetic) ones. Lots of problems (coating, drop counts, humidity, fog, graininess, clearing, paper suitability, etc.) came up in the initial stage. I assume more technical problems will surface along the way. But when an image turns out right, it looks right. Seems easy enough; little or no manipulation needed. Mainly tone, contrast, and feel of the print. Somehow I think I am being naive thinking this way? What am I missing?

    Thanks.

  3. #3
    scootermm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    1,867
    Images
    235
    per sandys exact suggestion above... Ive double coated and there was a distinctly nicer looking image when I did it with Van Dyke Brown printing and the ware cyanotype solution. Have yet to try it with palladium/platinum printing though.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    North York, Ontario, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    101
    I also double coat and find it to be essential for plat printing. When I first started I tried, as some have suggested, applying a single 'heavy' coating but did not find the results as good. Some have also suggested the benefits of double coating are paper dependent - this may be true but I didn't find it so for the papers I use (Platine/Cot, Cranes). Oddly enough the one thing I do notice is the benefits of double coating are, for me, more apparent when printing in the winter (vs the summer) when the RH is low.

  5. #5
    Ole
    Ole is offline
    Ole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bergen, Norway
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    9,280
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    31
    I learned today that with double-coating van Dykes you double the chances for really screwing things up, but the end result is far better if it's good...
    -- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
    Norway

  6. #6
    Joe Lipka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Cary, North Carolina
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    808
    Quote Originally Posted by sanking
    I double coat routinely, both Pt./Pd. and kallitype. However, I dilute the second coating 1:1 with water. So for an 8X10 print I would use 2ml of the sensitizer for the first coating, then dilute the 1 ml with water for the second coating.

    Sandy
    Run that by me again?

    Do you mean 2 ml of sensitizer for the first coat. The second coat is only 1 ml of sensitizer, but you add another 1 ml to get you the volume to make the coating easier?
    Two New Projects! Light on China - 07/13/2014

    www.joelipkaphoto.com

    250+ posts and still blogging! "Postcards from the Creative Journey"

    http://blog.joelipkaphoto.com/

  7. #7
    smieglitz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,863
    Images
    97
    Quote Originally Posted by rogein
    I also double coat and find it to be essential for plat printing. When I first started I tried, as some have suggested, applying a single 'heavy' coating but did not find the results as good. Some have also suggested the benefits of double coating are paper dependent - this may be true but I didn't find it so for the papers I use (Platine/Cot, Cranes). Oddly enough the one thing I do notice is the benefits of double coating are, for me, more apparent when printing in the winter (vs the summer) when the RH is low.
    Although I've never done a Pt/Pd print I have done a lot of double-coated Van Dyke Brownprints and a few cyanotypes, salted paper, and albumen prints. Your comments reminded me that in addition to making the emulsion coat more even and increasing the maximum density, the second coat always seems to absorb and go on smoother than the first. I think this is probably related to the first coat having to soak through the paper's internal sizing and then raising the knap of the paper and allowing the second coat to permeate better. I wonder if those effects could be approximated by simply doing a first coat of water instead of emulsion? Anybody tried that? (I know some workers do a citric or oxalic acid treatment on certain papers to control the pH before applying the emulsion.)

    Joe

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Greenville, SC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,813
    Images
    5
    Joe,

    I think the answer to your question is no. Memory is that I tested the concept at one time, but don't have the data now. But you can easily test yourself.

    What I think is this. Double coat, but fix the first coating on the paper quickly with forced air on the print. Not hot, just plain forced air at room temp as with a hair dryer on no-heat. This will prevent the emulsion seeping too far into the paper.

    Now, come back with the second coat. No forced aid should be needed at this point.

    Sandy

    Quote Originally Posted by smieglitz
    I wonder if those effects could be approximated by simply doing a first coat of water instead of emulsion? Anybody tried that? (I know some workers do a citric or oxalic acid treatment on certain papers to control the pH before applying the emulsion.)

    Joe

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    North York, Ontario, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    101
    Quote Originally Posted by smieglitz
    I wonder if those effects could be approximated by simply doing a first coat of water instead of emulsion? Anybody tried that? (I know some workers do a citric or oxalic acid treatment on certain papers to control the pH before applying the emulsion.)

    Joe
    While I've not tried doing an actual water 'coat', during the winter when the RH is low around these parts, I often pre-humidify the paper *before* the first coat is applied giving slightly better results. Basically I'm trying to match my 'ideal' coating/printing conditions that I get in the 'summer' months - ie. 22C, RH 60%

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Greenville, SC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,813
    Images
    5
    The first coat (for 8X10 or equivalent size) has 2 ml of sensitizer, 1 ml of ferric oxalate, 1 ml of metal salt. The second coat has 1 ml of sensitizer (FO + metal salt) plus 1 ml of water.

    The advantage is that you don't use quite as much of the sensitizer but Dmax is as great.

    Sandy


    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Lipka
    Run that by me again?

    Do you mean 2 ml of sensitizer for the first coat. The second coat is only 1 ml of sensitizer, but you add another 1 ml to get you the volume to make the coating easier?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin