Switch to English Language Passer en langue franÁaise Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,705   Posts: 1,482,756   Online: 1034
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    JOSarff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Fe, NM
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    203

    To mask or not to mask

    When contact printing your negative in various historic processes, do you mask the area outside the negative, or let it go black?

    Secondly, do you cut your mats to hide or show the black?

  2. #2
    Anupam Basu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    504
    Images
    20
    No, I don't mask and yes I let it show. I like the rough edged look.

  3. #3
    nsurit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Texas Hill Country
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,183
    Images
    17
    It depends on the image. Some I have masked, some have been matted to crop out the rough edges and some I just gone crazy with a paint brush and included that as part of the piece. Guess that pretty much didn't answer your question. Here is one that I pretty much went crazy with the paint brush. http://www.pinholeday.org/gallery/20...Province=Texas

    Maybe this is what that "different strokes for different folks" deal is about . . . or maybe it isn't. Bill Barber

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Aurora, OH
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    76

    Masking Pt/Pd Prints

    As far as masking and black borders, I have done it all at different times in my work and I can safely say it is a personal choice for whatever phase you are in. I used to crop with the overmat. Then I matted the prints showing the hand coated black border. Iím a fairly precise coater so the border is fairly narrow but it is clearly hand coated. Then I started masking off the negatives so no black border showed. This can be a problem if you have any pure white anywhere on the edge of the image. The image bleeds off the sheet through the hole at the edge. Then I started masking the paper outside the negative edges with a removable tape, coated the paper, and removed the tape immediately so I had a clean and straight-edged black border. I personally prefer a clean edge whether a black border or not, but thatís a preference from a printerís perspective in terms of presentation. Iíve coated thousands of prints so I donít feel the need to prove I can coat by showing the borders. But itís all a personal preference.

    What I can tell you is that most of the people who buy my prints want to see the uneven hand coated border. When Iíve showed my work to museum curators and galleries, one of the first things they do is lift the overmat to see the entire print, border showing or not.

    Bob

  5. #5
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,079
    Images
    20
    With albumen, gold toner is too expensive to have large black areas outside the live image; it's hard enough to get a perfect coating the size of the image area let alone larger; and since coating is usually done by the float method, you don't get interesting brushstrokes, so most albumen printers trim to size. I don't think I've ever seen a historic albumen print with a sloppy border.

    APUG member, Gandolfi, posted a few albumen prints a while back that were brush coated and had a border, but he likes printing artifacts in general.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  6. #6
    Ian Leake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    1,355
    Images
    48
    I crop my prints. I don't like visible dark brushed edges for several reasons: they clash with my high key printing, I don't always compose to the edge of the frame (people move especially when in close), and if I'm brutally honest they feel like an affectation or an introduced artifact born out of fear ("proving" it's a hand coated print means nothing if the image is poor; if the image is great then what have you got to prove?). I also think it's pointless using an overmat to hide stuff I don't want to show - firstly because it's still there for anyone to see, secondly because it requires an extremely accurate overmat which doesn't shift to reveal or hide edge details, and thirdly because if the overmat is lost or damaged then you've lost your composition.

    I do occasionally use a brushed edge if it's within the film area so the print fades away to nothing without the jarring dark edges. That's sometimes very nice although it's quite difficult to get right.

  7. #7
    Akki14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    London, UK
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,872
    Images
    210
    I don't see what the fuss is about brushed borders. They're a fact of processing unless you really really like doing a lot of draft taping or cutting down post-production work. I don't like matting because, well, I don't like to make them. It's all too formal for me personally. I like people to be touchy feely about my stuff and not treat it as absolutely precious. It's just a photo.
    ~Heather
    oooh shiny!
    http://www.stargazy.org/

  8. #8
    davido's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    toronto, ontario canada
    Shooter
    Holga
    Posts
    458
    Images
    17
    I agree that the brushed border is part of the process, it's when it takes away from the image that I'm not in favour of them. I made a series of landscapes which I ended up over-matting the edges because the edges were so thick that they seemed confining to the image. I had been coating with a rod which was wider than the image area, which resulted in thick borders. Now, I'm using a brush for coating and very much enjoying the look of coating as close as possible to the image area. However, I do find the dry brush stroke look, for the most part, very distracting.
    It seems to me that in these times revealing the process is important, if only to set your work apart from digital work.

    -david

  9. #9
    Ian Leake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    1,355
    Images
    48
    The brushwork is part of the process but the process is only the means to an end - which for me is a finished print. Here is a 'before' and an 'after' JPEG of the print I've just posted in the gallery (Stray Hair). The first one shows the print 'au naturelle' with brushed border, etc., while the second shows it cropped and mounted. The two feel very different - in the first one the border imprisons the image and distracts the viewer - but once cropped and mounted the print is liberated and, most importantly, it's finished.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 080612-09 (Libby's Hair - Uncropped).jpg   080612-09 (Libby's Hair - Mounted).jpg  

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    324
    Images
    1
    Ian,

    So you cut the image out of the the paper it was printed on? Is that correct? May I ask how you 'mount' it?

    Thanks,

    Corey

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  ó   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin