Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,472   Posts: 1,570,960   Online: 760
      
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Somerville, MA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    9

    Kallitype with Fe(III) Ammonium Oxalate?

    Hi All,

    I've been doing Kallitypes for a while using the normal ferric oxalate/silver nitrate sensitizer. After reading Mike Ware's discussion of ferric oxalate -vs- ferric ammonium oxalate (and running low on the former) I tried using the ammonium as a direct replacement (20% w/v with 1% w/v oxalic acid acid + 10% w/v silver nitrate mixed 1:1).

    I got pretty good results, very nice tonality but a little weak. I did this off the cuff and expect I may need more of the ammonium to get an equal amount of ferric ions in my sensitizer, but before I reinvent the wheel, has anyone done this?

    My primary interest in the ammonium is that it's cheaper, easier to find, and much more soluble.

    Thanks,
    -Jon

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    australia
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    133
    Not tried but my back of the envelope calculation runs like so:

    Ferric oxalate = C6Fe2O12.5(H2O) mw 465 ish. 20% solution ~0.43M solution and so ~0.83M Fe
    Iron(III) NH3 ox C6H12FeN3O12.3H2O mw 428ish 1M 20% solution ~0.46M solution and so ~0.46M Fe

    so if its *just* the iron Id double my concentration. What the NH3 and oxalate do in the reaction I have NFI. Perhaps ask Mike Ware via his website?

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Somerville, MA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    9
    Thanks for saving me the math

    I'm a bit hazy on the exact reaction my self. Certainly the Iron is the most important as that's what's photosensitive. Comparing formulas that use the NH4 it does seem to be mixed at about double concentration.

    I've been speculating on what the other ions may do but when you get down to it I have NFI either. I think I will drop Dr Ware and email as you suggest if I get an answer I'll follow up here.

    -Jon

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Somerville, MA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    9
    So here is Mike Ware's response to my query in case anyone is curious (I promise I'll now stop talking to my self)...

    ---
    As you may have guessed, this is not the first time this question has
    been asked, but it's a good one and deserves a sensible answer.

    Since you have a copy of my 'Chrysotype Manual' (Bravo! Would that
    more did!) then you can read my reasons for preferring ammonium iron
    (III) oxalate over iron(III) oxalate in detail on pp138-139, and
    these reasons apply in general, across all the iron-based processes.
    There are also some remarks to this effect buried in my webpages, see:

    http://www.mikeware.co.uk/mikeware/P...ladiotype.html

    There is an attempt to explain the differing photochemistry of the
    two substances here:

    http://www.mikeware.co.uk/mikeware/I...Processes.html

    and the role played by the ammonium ion in particular is suggested here:

    http://www.mikeware.co.uk/mikeware/F...Print-out.html

    having cited all this, I'll address your specific question about
    replacing iron(III) oxalate by ammonium iron(III) oxalate in Kallitype:

    First, concentrations. You're right: about twice the weight of the
    latter in the same volume will give nearly the same iron(III)
    concentration as the former. Actually slightly more: the factor is
    about 2x 428/466 = 1.84, but I wouldn't be fussy. Ammonium iron(III)
    oxalate is very soluble and easily dissolved as you will know.

    The problem with the Kallitype process - and the reason why ammonium
    iron(III) oxalate is not universally recommended for it - is the
    precipitation of the very insoluble silver oxalate, which is greater
    with ammonium iron(III) oxalate, because it generates more free
    oxalate ion. Some folk don't mind spreading a thick suspension of a
    solid onto their paper as a sensitized coating, but I do, and I
    cannot believe it is conducive to good print quality. My philosophy
    of siderotype is that the sensitizer should be a true aqueous
    solution, to penetrate the cellulose fibres, and it should not hold
    any solid matter in suspension, which will just lie on the paper
    surface, and probably wash off.

    Using iron(III) oxalate in Kallitype, it is possible to suppress the
    precipitation of silver oxalate altogether - at least for a time - by
    adding excess iron(III) salt such as the nitrate - see the
    experiments described in Dick Steven's book. With ammonium iron(III)
    oxalate you will always get a precipitate. I have tried quite a
    number of ways to prevent this - without success. The first person to
    do it will earn my respect and undying thanks! I am a great fan of
    ammonium iron(III) oxalate, and use it wherever I can (e.g. my New
    Cyanotype etc) but for iron-silver process I have had to compromise,
    and use the less satisfactory ammonium iron(III) citrate in my
    Argyrotype process. If I could have used ammonium iron(III) oxalate
    without precipitating silver oxalate, I would have.

    I think that about summarises my thoughts. You are welcome to quote
    and publish this response on the APUG forum, if you think it will
    help others. I don't think I'm subscribed to do this myself.

    All good wishes, and let me know how you get on,

    Mike
    ---

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    australia
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    133
    Thanks. He is a fount of wisdom!

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    544
    Hi Jon,

    You may like to read the thread I started whilst I was experimenting with kallitypes using FAO. There's some input from Sandy King there too - he's very experienced with kallitypes. Wishing you better results with it.
    testing...

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Greenville, SC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,813
    Images
    5
    Regarding the use of AFO for kallitype I agree with the comments by Mike Ware. It may be possible to make prints of excellent technical quality with silver nitrate and AFO but I have never been able to do so in spite of quite a bit of experimentation.

    Sandy King




    Quote Originally Posted by kevs View Post
    Hi Jon,

    You may like to read the thread I started whilst I was experimenting with kallitypes using FAO. There's some input from Sandy King there too - he's very experienced with kallitypes. Wishing you better results with it.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Somerville, MA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    9
    Clearly more investigation is needed

    My initial tests we admittedly flawed in that I had insufficient Fe(III) in the sensitizer, and I'd blamed this for my low DMax. Sandy saw this as well, but didn't give a formulation for the tested sensitizer (presumably this was in the U of S link that is now dead).

    On Arches 140lb HP I did get fine detail and clean highlights in both 20% NaCitrate developer and a Borax/Rochelle developer (more or less from the Stevens book). Both of these were souped with K2Cr2O7 (about %0.02 final concentration).

    I did have a milky suspension rather than a clear solution for the sensitizer, the higher oxalate concentration in a solution with sufficient Fe(III) will probably make this worse.

    Guess it's time to pull out the step wedge and do some more controlled testing...

    -Jon

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    London
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    7
    Interesting thread this and very useful for my experiments.

    I separated out the sensitizer and just coated with the ammonium iron(III) oxalate. Very quick exposure times, then developed in a solution of Silver nitrate and tartaric acid. I imagine this can be reused for quite a while but will still be more expensive than adding it to the coating.

    Bonus is it works - very nice dark tones. I developed after in a solution of Rochelle salt and Borax although I suspect this isn't necessary.

    Here's an example --- http://www.flickr.com/photos/sebsuss...ream/lightbox/ - more testing needed especially in terms of the right neg. Step wedge testes definitely needed
    ---------------------------------------------
    Double Negative Darkroom
    178a Glyn Road, E5 0JE
    Colour and B&W Processing and printing and alt processes
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/sebsussmann
    www.sebsussmann.co.uk

  10. #10
    Mike Wilde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Misissauaga Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,939
    Images
    29
    Thank you for this information.
    I am getting my Cyanotype process under control using both traditional and Ware formulated senitizers.
    Kallitype was going to be my next step on my alt process wandering path.
    my real name, imagine that.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin