Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,704   Posts: 1,482,742   Online: 1017
      
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    melbourne australia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    40

    HIPPOLYTE BAYARD direct positive process

    Has anybody tired this ?

    The direct positive process involved exposing silver chloride paper to light, which turned the paper completely black.
    It was then soaked in potassium iodide before being exposed in a camera.

    After the exposure, it was washed in a bath of (Sodium thiosulfate) hyposulfite of soda and dried.

    The resulting image was a unique photograph that could not be reproduced.

    Due to the paper's poor light sensitivity, an exposure of approximately twelve minutes was required. Using this method of photography, still subject matter, such as buildings, were favored. When used for photographing people, sitters were told to close their eyes so as to eliminate the eerie, "dead" quality produced due to blinking and moving one's eyes during such a long exposure.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    213
    sounds interesting.
    is the paper still wet (from the iodide) during exposure?

  3. #3
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    15,951
    Images
    148
    Kodak manufactured a direct copying film that worked in a similar way, and I think EFKE still make a direct positive paper which is sold by Freesyle. They still need developing though.

    Ian

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    melbourne australia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    40
    Quote Originally Posted by phritz phantom View Post
    sounds interesting.
    is the paper still wet (from the iodide) during exposure?
    sorry I dont have have that info
    do you think it should be wet ?

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by brucej View Post
    sorry I dont have have that info
    do you think it should be wet ?
    i have no idea... this is the first time, i've heard about that process.
    if you'd soak it in iodine, it gets wet, which would be rather impractical to have inside the camera. but i don't know if the process allows a intermediate drying.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    15,260
    Blog Entries
    2
    Images
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Grant View Post
    Kodak manufactured a direct copying film that worked in a similar way, and I think EFKE still make a direct positive paper which is sold by Freesyle. They still need developing though.

    Ian

    "professional duplicating film" was a single step ( negative to negative or positive to positive ) film that kodak sold but stopped making.
    photowarehouse sells the same thing .. it is very slow, like azo paper,
    and requires a floodlight to expose (i have used a 300W bulb) it would be between 7 and 10 stops slower than conventional photo paper, rated somewhere
    between asa 6 and 25 ... and it is processed in paper developer ...

    some folks have had very good results shooting the efke paper.
    on the large format forum there are a handful of recent posts that look very nice.

  7. #7
    GCyberfish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Germany, Mecklenburg - Western Pommerania
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    11
    I tried this with standard photo paper and got ... intresting results but nothing useable for
    photographic purposes:


    I may have to experiment with the time of preexposure and the type of
    Developer. Maybe a ...surface -developer?(<-don´t know the word for it) would work better than RODINAL.
    TALBOT described the Iodide-method in combination with his calotype
    process.

    I hope you can understand my english
    Last edited by GCyberfish; 02-21-2009 at 01:05 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  8. #8
    Eugen Mezei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    94
    Quote Originally Posted by phritz phantom View Post
    sounds interesting.
    is the paper still wet (from the iodide) during exposure?
    An advantage of the process was that the papers could be prepared before use and stored up to one month. So I guess they were dry.

    Still I am very interested to get this information confirmed (or infirmed) as I would like to try the process if the paper is indeed dry when I put it into the sheet holders.

    Did any one of you tried the process in practice? (Bayards one, please no further references to what more or less similar can be obtained on the market. I am interested in this as a method to prepare my own photosensitive material.)
    I think it could be very usefull for static models (arhitecture, maybe nature too). Bayard reached 12 minutes for an exposure, that is not too bad.

    Greetings,
    Eugen



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin