Discussions: 60,973 | Messages: 835,002 | Members: 39,722 | Online: 405 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
Support Doctors Without Borders in Haiti

 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE  FORUMS   SELECT LANGUAGE  
Customize Sidebar
Recent Classifieds
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > Darkroom > Alternative Processes > Ortho-Litho Help!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-18-2009, 07:41 AM   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 241
Images: 1
Hello,
Try this link-
http://www.apug.org/forums/forum42/4...ast-night.html
FM2N is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-18-2009, 09:47 AM   #12 (permalink)
 
JBrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Utah, USA
Posts: 5,639
Blog Entries: 8
Another option is to shoot e-6 positive (gives a sort of wet plate effect when enlarged on to ortho-litho), or develop your b&W camera film as a slide, or use dr5. It works well and makes enlarging to a negative a one step process.

dr5 is here:

http://www.dr5.com/
__________________
--J Brunner, The Prints of Darkness (An Angel who did not so much fall, as Saunter Vaguely Downwards)


Developing video:
http://www.jasonbrunner.com/videos.html

My Photostream:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/21376451@N05/
JBrunner is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 03-18-2009, 06:27 PM   #13 (permalink)
 
davido's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: toronto, ontario canada
Posts: 378
Images: 1
I have been shooting Scala 120 (I bought a bunch a while back) and sending it DR5. The turn around for someone living here in Canada is a bit slow but the B&W slides are stunning. I then print the negative on lith film and develop in LC-1 developer. I used dilute HC-110 for while but couldn't get the contrast I was after. Even with skipping the inter-positive step, there is an increase in contrast from your original. In fact, creating a very low contrast inter-positive is good way to control the contrast but it's alot more work.
There are alot of variables to contend with. Just keeping consistent temp. in a tray is tough. I created an agitation system using a window squeegee which passes over the negative without touching. I found that normal try rocking was creating negs with inconsistent development- more density at the edges. I am getting developing times between 12-18 minutes with the LC-1!
Lith film is cheap but getting the right development time and temp is tough and the results are in no way consistent.
So, it's really about your expectations. If you're happy with an image then fine but if you really want to perfect your negative, it can drive you a little crazy!


-david
davido is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 


APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)