Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,723   Posts: 1,514,994   Online: 1214
      
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    21

    Palladium Na2 method

    I've managed to finally get some decent prints using the B&S Ferric Oxalate 1 and 2 solutions, and just got their Na2 Kit. But I need some advice as to a starting point. I'm doing my current prints at 1/3 2/3 ratio both for platinum to palladium and the Ferric Oxalate solutions - for 12 drops of palladium what's a good starting point for how many drops of the Na2 solution? (there's no indication if the Na2 is 5, 10 or 20% concentration)

  2. #2
    Monophoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Saratoga Springs, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,691
    Images
    44
    Normally, the NA2 method uses only Palladium salts. NA2 is actually Sodium Chloroplatinate - it contains platinum - so you generally don't need to use pure platinum. That's good because the NA2 material is expensive, and the process is economically appealing only if it offsets the need for both the Ferric Oxalate No.2 AND platinum.

    I use equal quantities of Ferric Oxalate No 1 and palladium - in my case, 6 drops of each per 4x5 print. The contrast ratios that I use are listed in the table.

    This table quantifies contrast via contrast ratios. I don't have any way to measure contrast ratio, but I find that the generic "more contrasty" or "less contrasty" combined with trial and error works reasonably well.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Drawing1.jpg  
    Last edited by Monophoto; 03-24-2009 at 07:25 PM. Click to view previous post history.
    Louie

  3. #3
    TheFlyingCamera's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Washington DC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    8,155
    Blog Entries
    51
    Images
    432
    NA2 is quite potent, so I would start off with "less is more" until you get your process nailed down. Let's put it this way - I only use 1 drop of the stock dilution for an 8x10 (roughly 12-14 drops Palladium and 12-14 drops FeOx) when dealing with a fairly flat negative. YMMV, so experiment.

  4. #4
    sly
    sly is offline
    sly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Nanaimo
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,338
    Images
    215
    If you got the same kit I did you have 20% solution. You need to make other dilutions from your "stock", to give you a range of contrasts.
    I mixed 4 parts H2O to 4 parts Na2 for 10%
    6 parts H2O to 2 parts Na2 for 5%
    7 parts H2O to 1 part Na2 for 2.5%

    I've attached a scan of a chart I made for myself from info in Christina Anderson's book "Alternative Processes Condensed".
    Hope this gives you a starting point. Post some prints when you have some.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails File0001.jpg  

  5. #5
    MVNelson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    North Florida
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    5,193
    Images
    247
    Tim, here is an excellent reference by Dick Arentz, http://www.dickarentz.com/na2.html .... I have done the step tablet test using the chart and the numbers are rock solid ...
    Miles :
    cherish light



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin