Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,211   Posts: 1,532,000   Online: 1188
      
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Just north of the Inferno
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    750
    Images
    27
    I have a question about color seperation.

    Now, if I am looking to do a gum print, I can do it in 3 or 4 passes using the CYM or CYMK method. A layer for Cyan, a layer for Magenta, etc.

    Fine and dandy.

    My question is this...

    For reasons of sheer "doability", it looks like digital negs are the way to go. Much better control. I know, nasty stuff, but what choice does one have besides making 3 or 4 in camera shots with filters?

    Doing some research, I found Sam Wang's article on Unblinking Eye ( http://unblinkingeye.com/Articles/3CG/3cg.html )

    Nice, but confusing. It seems you invert the image and then make a neg from each layer. Fine, but I'm not sure how this works out in real life? It LOOKS like Photoshop inverts all the colors. The Wang talks about opposite colors and my head starts to spin. Color theory is something I am not big on. Any insights here?
    Official Photo.net Villain
    ----------------------
    [FONT=Comic Sans MS]DaVinci never wrote an artist's statement...[/FONT]

  2. #2
    rc3
    rc3 is offline

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    2
    I just started to work with Sam's method and have made one good print. I invert the image and then split channels and have a gray scale for RGB. Red=Cyan,Green=Magenta and blue=yellow. I put about six coats of yellow and red layers over the cyanatype. Need to find a better red for the one I am using is to red/orange. With a true red color correction would would take less effort and layers. Since I am new to gum printing I am going through different pigments and how they work with the gum.

    So Sam's article is a good starting point, just a matter of time finding the right combinations of pigment layers and exospore for each layer.

    Best Regards,
    Robert

  3. #3
    rc3
    rc3 is offline

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    2
    I just uploaded a small scan of a work print of the tri-color gum to my photo gallery.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    New Jersey
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    28
    What's wrong with making 3 or 4 in-camera negatives? SOme photographers were still shooting separations in the 70's and early 80's, and that's all they did before that (for the really good work).

    I've never worked in color separations, but all it is is making three or four identical negs but with different filters. Granted, with subjects which aren't totally stationary it might be a bit of a problem (unless you want to build a custom camera) but it's doable.

    Oh, also, I guess this is what should come to mind first, since it was the method used up until (relatively) recently when the press world went digital:
    You shoot regular color film and then, in the darkroom, make (contact or enlarged) separations from the original neg.
    -Jason Antman

    "There is nothing worse than a sharp photograph of a fuzzy concept." - A. A.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin