Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,547   Posts: 1,573,020   Online: 874
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,243
    Images
    9

    Collodian Question

    I've been reading lots and lots of web stuff on collodian and I was about to order a book or join Quinn Jacobson's online course to do it but I keep running into two statements that irritate me and make me wonder if the process is even worth exploring for me.

    On the Sally Mann video she says the foreign objects, peeling stuff and the ridges in the emulsion are unexpected, and she seems to like this lack of control and in my opinion her collodian work is ugly because of it. This is obviously my opinion and my taste and your's will most likely be different.

    I read something else to this effect on another site. Wish I could remember what site it was.

    Okay, I am not adverse to clutter. Hell entropy follows me wherever I go, except into my photography, where being in ultimate control is relaxing for me.

    Are these two statements true? A big part of me says these two artists are unwilling to put in the practice and call piss poor technique part of the art. The other part of me likes the slight peeling around the edges as long as the subject is not interfered with. but I HATE the uneven coating/ridges?

    Now, I look at Coffer's work, Jacobson's work, and some of the work here and have to wonder. I don't see the uneven coatings. Am I missing it?

    Is collodian capable of smooth even coats free of foreign matter and ridges in the coatings? Seriously, when it comes to my work I cannot stand NOT being in control of every part. I am willing to put in the required practice to make things smooth and be able to control the other aspects. If they cannot be controlled I'll skip the process.

    Anythoughts?
    Technological society has succeeded in multiplying the opportunities for pleasure, but it has great difficulty in generating joy. Pope Paul VI

    So, I think the "greats" were true to their visions, once their visions no longer sucked. Ralph Barker 12/2004

  2. #2
    Barry S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    DC Metro
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,263
    Images
    31
    I've only been doing wet plate for a short time, but I can assure you, some photographers routinely make perfect plates (definitely not me). I went to a Jill Enfield lecture and her plates are also full of flaws--which she cultivates. She claims she can make a perfect plate anytime she wants to, and that may be true, but I'd only take a workshop from someone that demonstrates mastery. I'm sure Quinn's online course would be excellent.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,243
    Images
    9
    That is my thought exactly. If she said she could make a perfect plate she needs to show one.

    So, when I look at Coffer's and Jacobson's I am not just missing the flaws then?
    Technological society has succeeded in multiplying the opportunities for pleasure, but it has great difficulty in generating joy. Pope Paul VI

    So, I think the "greats" were true to their visions, once their visions no longer sucked. Ralph Barker 12/2004

  4. #4
    Barry S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    DC Metro
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,263
    Images
    31
    The photographers consistently making excellent plates also have problems crop up, but they have the expertise, persistence, and will to solve them--usually quickly. I've noticed that some people doing wet plate have the same "problems" consistently and they either can't or don't want to fix them. My own goal is to be able to produce high quality plates, but they don't need to look like they were made by a machine.

  5. #5
    Kerik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    California
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,467
    Images
    238
    It is definitely possible to make nice, clean plates with collodion. Look at historical work as well as some of the other contemporary workers. I've been accused of making plates that are too perfect at times. :-) Here are a couple of pretty clean plates:

    http://www.apug.org/gallery1/showima...&imageuser=311

    http://www.apug.org/gallery1/showima...&imageuser=311

    I embrace the flaws and serendipitous nature of the process, but there are times when I want a "perfect" plate and I can usually get it. But, the perfection you seek will take some time, guidance and practice to accomplish. The process can be controlled to a point, but if you're an absolute control FREAK, you may give up in frustration before you get the results you seek. Also be prepared for the unpredictable chemicals issues that can haunt you once all your physical skills are perfected. There's a great support group for those issues on Quinn's forum at www.collodion.com.
    Kerik Kouklis
    Platinum/Gum/Collodion
    www.kerik.com
    2014 Workshop Schedule Online

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Shooter
    Pinhole
    Posts
    144
    Images
    39
    If possible, take a workshop. We all not only have different skill levels, but different intent. And the people you have mentioned may be inviting interesting mishaps. And from the recent show of Sally Mann's work, I'm convinced that not only is she in total control, but she is manipulating the plates. But, you won't know how the plates will come out, or if the process is of sustainable interest (you are willing to put in the effort required) until you try. And a well spent weekend workshop can answer those questions.

    Anne

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,243
    Images
    9
    The issues with workshops are
    A-I cannot justify the expense of the workshop itself, not to mention the huge amount of travel I would have to do to attend one. To attend one of Coffer's workshops It would cost me around 1500 dollars after travel and tuition. DO you have any idea of the amount of camera gear I could buy with that amount, if I had it?
    B-Time. This is why Jacobson's online thing would work best for me

    I have no problem learning a new skill and taking the time to learn it well. I also have no problem with chemical weirdness or problems that pop up. But if my stuff was going to have to look like Jill Enfield or Sally Mann's, why bother.

    Thanks for the examples KeriK. I was wondering if the ridges and uneven coating was hidden in the scan. Now that I know things can be controlled I will go further.

    Anyone know anything about Quinn's online course?
    Technological society has succeeded in multiplying the opportunities for pleasure, but it has great difficulty in generating joy. Pope Paul VI

    So, I think the "greats" were true to their visions, once their visions no longer sucked. Ralph Barker 12/2004

  8. #8
    Kerik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    California
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,467
    Images
    238
    I've not seen Quinn's online workshop stuff, but knowing him well, my guess is that it's first rate.
    Last edited by Kerik; 10-23-2009 at 07:08 PM. Click to view previous post history.
    Kerik Kouklis
    Platinum/Gum/Collodion
    www.kerik.com
    2014 Workshop Schedule Online

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    872
    Images
    24
    I have read Quinn's book on wet plate work, and it is excellent. It gives step by step instructions for mixing the chemicals and pouring the plates. It also has a section on trouble shooting. The illustrations are helpful. I have only read 3 or 4 books on wet plate, but Quinn's was by far the most straight forward.

    I do wonder about your first post, however. The wet plate process in inherently unpredictable. As the collodion ages, its characteristics change. The contrast changes and exposure time changes. A light meter will only give you a rough starting point. The more you get into wet plate, the more you understand and anticipate the changes. But it is not like film, where you can take a meter reading and develop for a certain time and be pretty much guaranteed an acceptable outcome. You will need to become more intuitive in your work, especially in judging the light and therefore exposure. I find it enjoyable, but your milage may vary given the concerns expressed in post #1.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    183
    I think at one time Sally Mann said she was getting too good at coating with her regular hand and switched to get those irregularities. I wasn't aware of Jill Enfield doing wetplate or workshops, as of 5 years ago she was still having a lady(not sure her name) come in to give the demo to her class at Parsons.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin