Hello all, I apologize if this post is in the wrong area, but I tried to get it in the Grey Area subforum.
My question is this: How do traditional optical RA prints from a MF or 4x5 negative compare to negatives scanned in an Epson v700/v750 and then printed on an inkjet printer? Let's say the final print is 16x20.
I currently use a Super Chromega Dichro and I am considering purchasing the V700/V750. I'm a high school teacher so Imacon scanners are way out of my budget. I'm not sure if this subject has been covered ad nausem, but I've scoured this site and the entire information superhighway and could not find an answer.
Any thoughts or help would be much appreciated. Furthermore, I'd love to hear from somebody who has experience with both.