Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,290   Posts: 1,535,378   Online: 812
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
  1. #1
    michael9793's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Fort Myers, Florida, USA
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    2,001
    Images
    111

    Double coating with dichromate

    Does anyone know what would happen if you coat your transfer tissue and let it dry then coat it again. Does it make any difference or are you just wasting dichromate.
    I'm new to pigment transfer so this stupid question may have been answered. I just can't find it.
    Thank you
    Mike
    "Capturing an image is only one step of the long chain of events to create a beautiful Photograph” See my updated website: mandersenphotography.com

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, WA USA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    302
    Keep in mind, it's the total amount of dichromate that you put into the tissue that matters. If you split that same amount up into 1, 2, 3, or even 4 coatings, it won't really make a difference, unless you wait quite some time between coatings, and then you risk some chemical fog.

    If you're asking what the effect of doubling the amount of dichromate has, it will reduce contrast by the equivalent of about 1/2 a grade or so, and will increase speed roughly 1/6 to 1/3 of a stop.

    I don't want to discourage discussion on this forum, but you may want to check out the Bostick & Sullivan carbon printing forum, too. It's a great resource.

    Good luck with your learning...It's been about a month since I took my first carbon printing workshop, and if I would quit "trying something new" and just settle down and get dialed in, I'd be printing real images instead of step wedges.

    --Greg

  3. #3
    Vaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Humboldt Co.
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    4,635
    Images
    40
    I take the amount I brush onto the tissue and divide it to two parts, brush on half until the tissue is dry (no surface moisture) then brush on the second half. Sandy King recommends this method. I do not know his reason, but I do it so that none of the liquid runs off the tissue.

    But give it a try and compare it to doing it all at once -- and let us know if there is any difference!

    Vaughn
    At least with LF landscape, a bad day of photography can still be a good day of exercise.

  4. #4
    michael9793's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Fort Myers, Florida, USA
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    2,001
    Images
    111
    Thank you for both your answers. I usually soak in a tray for 1-2 mins then squeegee off and dry the back with paper towels.
    "Capturing an image is only one step of the long chain of events to create a beautiful Photograph” See my updated website: mandersenphotography.com

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, WA USA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    302
    If you're soaking the tissue, the answer gets a little more complex, and would require a little more testing.

    It's possible, depending on dichromate concentration, temperature, etc., that the gelatin is absorbing most (or all) that it can during the first bath. In that case, a second bath would only contribute a little, or not at all. The same result could be accomplished by soaking longer in the first bath.

    So you won't be wasting dichromate, per se, but you might be wasting time and effort in the second bath and second drying time.

    --Greg

  6. #6
    Vaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Humboldt Co.
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    4,635
    Images
    40
    I have always assumed ( a dangerous thing LOL! ) that the dichromate gets absorbed into the tissue fairly easily. If this is the case, double-dipping, so to speak, would only increase the amount of dichromate that gets into the tissue -- not necessarily any deeper nor more evenly distributed (but it would be interesting to do a controlled test to see if this is the case or not.) So double dipping may have no different effect than increasing the concentration of the dichromate for a single application, as Greg suggests.

    Vaughn

    edited after reading greg's post:

    Actually, if the tissue is completely dried after the first soak, the second soak might absorb about the same amount of liquid as the first soaking -- so it might double up the dichromate load in the tissue. Thanks for the question, Michael!
    Last edited by Vaughn; 06-17-2010 at 01:11 PM. Click to view previous post history.
    At least with LF landscape, a bad day of photography can still be a good day of exercise.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, WA USA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    302
    I had always assumed there was a physical limit to how much dichromate could be absorbed, but Vaughn may be right--the water may be limiting that. Drying in-between multiple baths might increase that limit.

    Mike, since Vaughn and I use a brush instead of a bath, please try it...maybe you could teach us something new!

    --Greg

  8. #8
    John Jarosz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Chicago area
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    148
    I mix my dichromate with water, but then dilute it with rubbing alcohol so the tissue dries faster. Seems I read a thread on the B&S carbon forum that the tissue absorbs more sensitizer if the solution is very cold. You can rummage around the B&S forum to find the thread. I'm sure it's there.

    John

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Greenville, SC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,813
    Images
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by gmikol View Post
    I had always assumed there was a physical limit to how much dichromate could be absorbed, but Vaughn may be right--the water may be limiting that. Drying in-between multiple baths might increase that limit.

    Mike, since Vaughn and I use a brush instead of a bath, please try it...maybe you could teach us something new!

    --Greg
    If you soak the tissue there is a finite amount of dichromate that can be absorbed. How much depends on the temperature of the solution, its strength, and whether or not it is diluted with alcohol or acetone.

    When I started the carbon discussion group on Yahoo last August or September one of the first things I did was post some test data on this topic. I had previously posted some tests along the same line on the B&S site but my notes there are not as extensive as on the Yahoo site.

    Although there are some advantages to soaking the tissue I continue to sensitize with the spirit method by brushing a dichromate solution plus acetone solution on the tissue. This method gives excellent results, though it requires some experience, as does coating for alternative processes like pt/pd, kallitype, vandyke, etc. However, with the spirit method you get the shortest drying time, and the method is more environmentally friendly than other methods because it uses an absolute minimum of dichromate and none is discarded.

    And Vaughn, the reason I divide the coating into two sessions separated by about five minutes to allow some drying is to get more dichromate into the tissue without having to brush for a very long time with double the amount applied once.

    Sandy King

  10. #10
    Vaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Humboldt Co.
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    4,635
    Images
    40
    Thanks Sandy. When I read about your method of dividing the sensitizer in half, it was like, "Of course! Why did I not think of that?!" Much easier to do it that way and not have sensitizer running all over the place! I don't wait the 5 minutes, though.

    Vaughn
    At least with LF landscape, a bad day of photography can still be a good day of exercise.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin