when does a photograph stop being a photograph ?
i guess the title kind of says it ...
when does work on a photograph ( hand coloring, painting using waxes and dyes, and ink and pencil and ... ) turn the photograph into something else ?
What other light sensitive images are there? I mean isn't the term Photography inclusive rather than exclusive? Aren't we all under a fairly large tent? Prints on paper have been tinted and colored since the beginning. I find your cyanotypes and your long sun exposures on paper fascinating. There are two or three that I simply love, and if I had Cindy Sherman's money...
"We often think that when we have completed our study of one we know all about two, because 'two' is 'one and one'. We forget that we have still to make a study of 'and'."
-A. S. Eddington
I had the same question, about this one, last year: http://www.apug.org/gallery1/showima...imageuser=7387
I came to the conclusion that the artist can call it whatever he/she wishes. I assume you're referring to your new work. You can call it a photograph (it is), a painting (it is), a drawing (it is). Whatever you wanna call 'em, I like 'em... They're really creative, and appealing, images.
Maybe you'd need a probablistic solution of some sort. Ask 1000 people to rate the photographic-ness of an object on a scale from 1-10 and analyze the results. It reminds me of strolling through an exhibition of pictorialism with my girlfriend and I was explaining all the processes used to make the images. We arrived at a photogravure and after some explanation--she said, "So that's not an actual photograph, then?" My eloquent response was, "Ahhhhhhhh...", and quickly walking on. The answer is to act like (and call yourself) an artist, not a photographer. Then you can simply list the materials beneath the title--gelatin silver print, wax, pigment, duck bills, twine, and mica.
Worrying about what to call an artwork is a job for your biographer. You just keep making them and we'll be happy.
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
thanks for the encouragement !
i have been thinking that
some of these images are so
non-photographic, they don't belong
on a photography website ..
( although they do use photosensitive material and light to make
the initial image ... )
Call them "mixed media". That is a common catch-all for pieces made from several different disciplines.
Or more importantly, when does a photograph stop being a photograph?
If you're speaking of your images and this website, I don't recall seeing anyone complain so far. Put me in the "it doesn't matter what you call it" camp.
Originally Posted by jnanian
San Diego, CA, USA
The lady of the house has to be a pretty swell sort of person to put up with the annoyance of a photographer.
-The Little Technical Library, _Developing, Printing, And Enlarging_
I don't know...but I think your recent pictures certainly belong here.
Crap like this is why I just call them pictures or prints.
"Truth and love are my law and worship. Form and conscience are my manifestation and guide. Nature and peace are my shelter and companions. Order is my attitude. Beauty and perfection are my attack."
- Rob Tyner (1944 - 1991)