Switch to English Language Passer en langue franšaise Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 74,537   Posts: 1,646,133   Online: 785
      
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    holmburgers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Rochester NY (native KS)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,423
    Images
    2

    Projecting/Enlarging Daguerreotypes

    If you have an opaque projector, what's to stop you from projecting and thus enlarging a daguerreotype?

    Presumably, it would project the negative image; so just do this onto a piece of black & white paper and voila, reproducible dag.

    What am I missing? Anyone have the apparatus to test this out?

    Talbot and Daguerre could've made a killing....
    If you are the big tree, we are the small axe

  2. #2
    holmburgers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Rochester NY (native KS)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,423
    Images
    2
    Looks like in the last 170 years someone else had this same thought... go figure!

    Before the collodion era, almost all photographic images were the size of the original camera exposure. John Draper experimented with enlarging daguerreotypes in 1840, and in 1843, Alexander Wolcott patented an enlarging device that permitted a daguerreotype to be rephotographed onto a larger plate or a piece of calotype paper. Others, including Talbot, conducted enlarging experiments, but the process was impractical and rarely done. from http://www.luminous-lint.com/IaW/public/5/2/4/8/0/20/T/

    Still, might be fun to do.
    If you are the big tree, we are the small axe

  3. #3
    michaelbsc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South Carolina
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,106
    Images
    5
    Who still has an old opaque projector. I don't think I've seen one in at least 35 years or more.
    Michael Batchelor
    Industrial Informatics, Inc.
    www.industrialinformatics.com

    The camera catches light. The photographer catches life.

  4. #4
    Steve Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ryde, Isle of Wight
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    8,846
    Images
    122
    Quote Originally Posted by michaelbsc View Post
    Who still has an old opaque projector. I don't think I've seen one in at least 35 years or more.
    There is one in my shed.


    Steve.
    "People who say things won't work are a dime a dozen. People who figure out how to make things work are worth a fortune" - Dave Rat.

  5. #5
    AgX
    AgX is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    9,649
    holmburgers,

    Get yourself a daguerreotype, place yourself on a swivel chair, the daguerreotype held in front of you, with a light-cone axis somewhat oblique to the revolving axle (ceiling light), and start revolving...

    More serious: you are reproducing an image located on a mirror plane, reflection off the lens, back to the plane will always be an issue with an optical axis perpendicular to that plane, unless you can precisely control the lighting.

  6. #6
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,670
    You would get a better result to shoot the original with a 4x5 copy camera (here is a chance to use one of those "Macro" lenses for 4x5) and get a good negative. Then enlarge that negative.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    saddleworth
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    7
    The black in a daguerreotype shows where there is no reflecting sliver. as mentioned the surface will always reflect the camera.
    I would shoot it at an oblique angle where reflections can be controlled, and use lens/ back swing to correct the focus.

    The resultant shot could be scanned to correct any distortions, or the purist could use a suitable adjustable enlarger.

  8. #8
    holmburgers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Rochester NY (native KS)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,423
    Images
    2
    Well I don't have an opaque projector nor a daguerreotype, so this is more of a 'hypothetical' situation than a practical one.

    But, what got me thinking was the method used to project Lippmann plates. The projector has two lights that illuminate the plate from oblique angles and a lens that peers directly at the plate. It'd be fairly easy to keep the lens in the dark and the plate would be highly illuminated and throw an image.

    I guess I'm mainly wondering why no one ever did this to produce daguerreotypes in days of yore. Then again, there's a big difference between a negative image and a printable negative.
    If you are the big tree, we are the small axe



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  Ś   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin