Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,844   Posts: 1,582,666   Online: 1084
      
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    henk@apug's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Belgium
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    181

    Expose direct positive paper

    Hello,

    I was just wondering : with direct positive paper, should one expose for the
    highlights, as opposed to expose for the shadows with negatives ?

  2. #2
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,382
    Exposing for the shadows, in B&W negative photography, makes the thinest printable negative (least possible exposure), which is usually a good thing. Since you are not using the paper as an intermediate, the latitude is zero. Therefore it does not matter if you make the least possible exposure (exposing for the highlights) or greatest possible exposure (exposing for the shadows) ; the exposure would be the same.

    Personally I'd expose for the highlights because determining the first light gray band when calibrating your system is easier for me than determining the first dark gray band in the black area. You will probably not be able to make the assumption that the first gray band (usable zone) on either side of middle is 4 stops away from your meters factory calibration (like one does in negative B&W film calibration). Maybe it is more like 3 stops with the Ilford paper.

    Maybe even easier is to forgo the spot meter and use an average meter. Adjust it to give the best possible image of your usual subject matter and lighting conditions.
    Last edited by ic-racer; 05-01-2012 at 03:29 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  3. #3
    andrew.roos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    474
    Images
    12
    You have to expose for both the shadows and the highlights, as you would a print. The dynamic range of Ilford Harmon paper is less than 3 stops unless it is pre-flashed as per the directions on the data sheet. That should make for some interestnig exposure trade-offs. (I'll be trying this in about a month when I'm running a class on pinhole cameras at my daughter's school).
    Last edited by andrew.roos; 05-01-2012 at 04:10 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  4. #4
    Joe VanCleave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
    Shooter
    Pinhole
    Posts
    494
    Yesterday the itch was strong enough such that it required satiating by exposing a number of Harman direct positives in my Speed Graphic, using a 150mm binocular lens improvised as a camera lens, stopped down to 20mm aperture. Lighting was indirect north daylight, absent any artificial illumination.

    All images preflashed and developed in Ilford PQ Universal paper developer for 2 minutes at 1+15 dilution.

    Hat: (1:00 minute exposure)

    Hat001a by jvcabacus, on Flickr

    Pig: (45 second exposure)

    Pig001a by jvcabacus, on Flickr

    Candle: (1:00 minute exposure)

    Candle001 by jvcabacus, on Flickr

  5. #5
    henk@apug's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Belgium
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    181
    Waaw, nice images Joe !



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin