Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,930   Posts: 1,556,893   Online: 932
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Shooter
    Pinhole
    Posts
    6

    Glossy? Semi-Matte? Pearl?

    I'm wondering what folks prefer for their paper negatives and why?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    1
    For colour print, I prefer glossy paper and then doff/matt coated. This way I get the more vibrant colour yet avoid the reflection of glossy paper.

  3. #3
    Dr Croubie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    rAdelaide
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,357
    Images
    2
    I personally can't stand glossy paper, inkjet or wetprint. If i have to move my head to see part of the photo because there's light reflecting off it, totally ruins the enjoyment of the shot.
    (I've just started inkjet printing, my packs of sample paper just arrived today. I'm really liking the look of the German Etching paper, the more matte and fibrous the better...)

    Come to think of it, that goes for computer monitors too. It took me ages to find a laptop with a matte screen, they're all glossy and hard to see in anything but a darkened room.
    An awful lot of electrons were terribly inconvenienced in the making of this post.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Live Free or Die
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,465
    Images
    90
    For a paper neg, glossy is probably best, followed by matte. I've not tried it, but pearl might add unwanted texture to the positive image. I use glossy for paper negs and it works pretty well.

  5. #5
    Thomas Bertilsson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Minnesota
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    14,367
    Images
    299
    I've only ever done paper negs on 5x7 matte Ilford MGIV paper, and that worked OK for contact printing. Have not tried glossy, but imagine it could potentially look sharper.
    "Often moments come looking for us". - Robert Frank

    "Make good art!" - Neil Gaiman

    "...the heart and mind are the true lens of the camera". - Yousuf Karsh

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Richmond VA.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,907
    To me I like pearl the best. Why I don't know!

    Jeff

  7. #7
    DWThomas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SE Pennsylvania
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,253
    Images
    65
    I've been using semi-matte (Arista.EDU RC #2), but that's for pinhole work, so I doubt I could tell whether the surface affects anything. I bought it because it's my preferred surface for prints, in case I gave up on paper negatives. I'm about to try some 8x10 contact prints from last Sunday's WPPD exercise, but I can see the whole business is at best a work in process here!

  8. #8
    horacekenneth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    MD
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    301
    If you're using a paint can for pinhole or a similar shape that has the paper at an unusual angle I've heard the glossy can reflect onto itself and cause obvious problems.

    I've never heard one way or another in a film holder but I'd wonder whether the glossy could cause stray light bouncing around in the bellows?

    I used pearl and had no problems with it, liked it very much.

  9. #9
    Joe VanCleave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
    Shooter
    Pinhole
    Posts
    484
    I've always used glossy for my paper negatives, but prefer the luster finish for contact prints.

    ~Joe

  10. #10
    NedL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Sonoma County, California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    901
    Images
    16
    I've been using pearl and semi-matte for everything so far. The texture does come through slightly on contact prints, but I think it looks good. Like DaveT I also use it for prints. Not sure if it's allowed to say it here, but I find the texture makes it hard to scan well, the problem being that the prints have depth and texture and sheen that are missing.

    I want to try glossy eventually and will not be surprised if it makes a sharper contact.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin