Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 57,950   Posts: 1,194,892   Online: 917
      
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Uncertain
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    7

    Enlarger for making large prints

    I would like to start making larger prints...at least 30x40" from 35mm and 6x7 film. Can someone suggest an enlarger for this? I assume I'll need to wall mount, and would prefer to project towards the floor. Also, can someone with experience give me an idea to some of the potential problems I may run into?

    Thanks, Frank

  2. #2
    ROL
    ROL is offline
    ROL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    359
    Any enlarger will do as long as you can get enough distance between the film and the projection surface. You only need high ceilings, or low floors, or both (and possibly ladders ). Wall mounting is preferable, but horizontal projection will introduce another level of complexity into your enlarging system. Condenser and diffuser light sources work better than cold lights in terms of reducing otherwise lengthy exposure times. I do up to 30"X40" here. You can enlarge any format given enough projection distance and sufficient light, but it will be tough to make fine prints much larger than 16"X20" with 35mm, even with Kodak Technical Pan.

    Your real issues begin with processing prints as large as you say. You need to plan ahead in terms of sinks and trays. 30"X40" is the largest I can personally handle by myself, and I have a 6' 2" wingspan. There are to many problems to enumerate here. Although in theory producing large prints doesn't have to be any different from normal printing, you will have to experiment and plan the execution of your mural sizes, given your particular lab environment.
    Last edited by ROL; 01-10-2012 at 08:29 PM.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    North Carolina
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    118
    Chemicals seem to be the biggest issue, here...even development, etc, get very problematic in large exposures. When you say "at least 30 x 40" it implies that some prints will be larger. Just the sheer space requirements for trays or tarps or whatever would lead to a LARGE work area.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,416
    If you are doing b&w work only, Durst Laborator 138 is fantastic, particularly for medium format and larger. Making 30x40 from 35mm format can be done, but it will require perfect negative on Tech Pan, APX25, Acros or TMX.

    I used to print 20x24 routinely with Laborator 138, and it was a breeze, with more room if needed.
    Boston photographer for editorial, fashion, and wedding.... one of few full time assignment shooters still set up to shoot film.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Uncertain
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    7
    Thanks everyone!

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,416
    btw I have Durst Laborator 138 with pretty complete condensers and negative carriers for sale. Item is in Boston.
    Boston photographer for editorial, fashion, and wedding.... one of few full time assignment shooters still set up to shoot film.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Uncertain
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    7
    One other thing...I see I can buy trays for 30x40, but how about easels, printwashers, etc., are these typically homemade?

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    94
    My brother was making huge prints in the 60s. I don't remember the full details, but there was a system available at the time consisting of a plastic tube with endcaps. One took the print and laid a blanket over it, rolled the two up together and slid them in the tube, then developed in the tube with a gallon or two of solution.. The secret was the blanket, which was a very porous plastic that separated the layers of the rolled up print and permitted the passage of developer. It closely resembled the green stuff lining grocery meat cooler displays of the time--very similar to today's Scotchbrite kitchen pads, without the abrasive, of course. It beat developing them on the basement floor next to the drain, with a sponge, which is how he started.

    Anyone old like me remember this system? It seems like there must be any number of materials available today to construct such a system.

  9. #9
    John Austin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Southern Forest Region, Western Australia
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    467
    Blog Entries
    3

    Roll troughs

    For big prints from any format, but mainly 10x8", I use a DeVere 5108 floor mounted enlarger and a turret in the darkroom ceiling to take the head for big prints, up to 36x45", and send the baseboard down to the floor - I stand on a milk crate to adjust the filtration since the head computer threw a fit and I replaced the servo motors with simple finger operated knobs

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	jbaphoto120103d1252.jpg 
Views:	86 
Size:	147.2 KB 
ID:	44209

    The 42" wide paper I currently use is Foma, but I have worked with Ilford in the 1980s and Agfa MCC 42" rolls after that

    The only easy way I know of processing really large sheets is to use shallow troughs each holding about 10 litres of sol'n with the dev' twice the dilution, so Bromophen is used at 1:5 or 1:7 - The print is allowed to carefully roll itself back up after the weights are removed from the edges - This roll is then lowered into the dev' trough and rolled from end to end, having an inland wet bench with an operator at either side is the easiest here - However, take great great great great care to start the rolling process evenly or you will form a crescent crease which will run the entire length of the paper and stuff it up mightily and not cheaply - The greatest danger the paper roll is in is when you lift it from the solution, this must be done with great care, lift one end up and let the liquid slowly drain out, there is a lot of it and it is far too heavy for the roll of paper to handle comfortably, so be patient - It also a good idea to use as little safe light as possible when making big prints as the whole process is somewhat protracted, from the cutting from the roll to getting the print into the fixer

    I have started a large print group now that I am returning to big prints - It in the APUG groups somewhere

    Pixs of the processing when I have some new negs, which will be about 4 days after I buy a new car, which will be after I sell all my Hasselblad stuff including an SWC

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    286
    Images
    3
    Where are you located, and how often will you be doing these really big prints?
    A few ideas:

    In San Francisco, there is a rental darkroom facility which has one darkroom setup for doing murals. They have the ability to deal with very large prints.

    If I were to do very large prints at home, I would think about doing the processing in other than trays - one thought would be to use the troughs that they sell at home improvement shops for wallpaper wetting, and roll the paper through the different chemicals. Another possibility would be to make a drum - a 12" diameter piece of sewer pipe would allow you to handle a print which was 36" on the short side - put some chemical in the drum and roll it to keep the chemicals moving over the surface of the print.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE:


 
                     

Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin