Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,592   Posts: 1,545,986   Online: 978
      
Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 48
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    SF Bay Area, California, US
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    276

    EL-Nikkor vs. Componon-S

    I have an EL-Nikkor 50/2.8 and 80/5.6 and a Componon-S 150.
    I am thinking of getting either an EL-Nikkor 105, or a Componon-S 100 for 6x6 and 6x9.
    I am partial to Nikon lens, but was told by my college instructor that the Componon-S is a better lens.
    But from my research on the web, it seems that there is very little real difference between the EL-Nikkor and Componon-S lenses.
    I would like to get feedback of those with experience with these 2 lines of lenses about any "real differences" between them, or are they even enough that I should just get whichever I can get the best deal on?

  2. #2
    AndreasT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Berlin
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    355
    I would say there is no real difference to be seen in my oppionion. The differnces are so small. I have used mostly Rodenstock and nikkor lenses. Actually I would say Nikkor is for most sizes a tick, a small tick better. Others will claim differently.
    The nikkoer has more blades in the aperture, that certainly can't be bad.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Live Free or Die
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,408
    Images
    89
    Ctein did a pretty comprehensive test of these lenses in Post Exposure and there is't much practical difference. You can read it here; http://ctein.com/booksmpl.htm

  4. #4
    brucemuir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Metro DC area, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,264
    Images
    4
    The only time you might notice for modest enlargement is if you get a compoNAR or some other nar suffix with denotes a manufacturers cheaper 4 element economy line.

    Not sure how the nikon line denotes the cheaper line but one giveaway is the slower aperture for that particular focal length.

  5. #5
    Lukas_87's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Prague, Czech Republic (Europe)
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    114
    Images
    2
    There's bigger difference between particular lens samples than between two good-quality 6 element design 100-105 mm enlarger lens.

  6. #6
    brian steinberger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    2,331
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    100
    I can say that I have the Componon-s 100/5.6 for smaller enlargements of 6x6 and 6x4.5 and it is fantastic!! For larger enlargements I recently purchased a Rodenstock Rodogon APO (Non-N) 80/4 and it is incredibly sharp! For 35mm I use a 50/2.8 Nikkor that is fantastic too! Basically you have to buy and try. Enlarging lenses are strange beasts, some get bad copies of certain lenses, while others report they are great. Once you get a good lens never let go of it.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    SF Bay Area, California, US
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    276
    Thanks guys. That takes some of the confusion between brand out. I'll just see which one I can get for the best price.
    Yes I would be looking for the Componon-S version. When I first heard the names of the Schnider lenses I was confused, the names of the 3 lens lines were so similar.

  8. #8
    MattKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Delta, British Columbia, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    12,404
    Images
    60
    I would suggest you also pay attention to ergonomics and things like whether the lens has readable illuminated f/stops.

    If you print colour, lenses from the same manufacturer, and of similar vintage, are more likely to have similar colour rendition.
    Matt

    “Photography is a complex and fluid medium, and its many factors are not applied in simple sequence. Rather, the process may be likened to the art of the juggler in keeping many balls in the air at one time!”

    Ansel Adams, from the introduction to The Negative - The New Ansel Adams Photography Series / Book 2

  9. #9
    jjphoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    137
    I don't have the 105 nikkor but I do have the 100/5.6 Componon-s and find it one of my sharpest enlerging lenses (I have a few enlarging lenses). I'm not sure that my APO-Rodagon-N 80/4 is any sharper than the Schneider 100/5.6 Componon-s although I haven't compared them directly. I have several Nikkors, 50/2.8, 63/2.8, a couple of 75/4's and all are extremely sharp so I would expect the longer lenses to be extremely good too. I don't think either will dissapoint.

    Although these are tests as taking lenses in a macro setting I think they are quite telling. There's a test of the Nikkor here:
    http://coinimaging.com/nikon_el105.html

    And a few other enlarging lenses here:
    http://coinimaging.com/Lens_tests.html
    Last edited by jjphoto; 02-03-2013 at 04:05 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Dunedin,New Zealand
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    269
    The 80/5.6 EL Nikkor is rated for full coverage for 6x7 negs,and works well,in my practical experience ,for this format.
    For 6x9,you should look for the 105mm.

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin