Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 76,252   Posts: 1,680,461   Online: 737
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20
  1. #11

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    38
    Unlike camera lenses, where choice of focal lengths is substantial for any given negative size, you're quite limited in the darkroom. You can go longer, but hardly shorter on focal lengths for a given negative. I don't know of any enlarging lenses for 4x5 below 135 (although I would not be surprised if there are some with satisfactory coverage), which as stated already is going to give you the largest print size for same elevation.

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    SF Bay Area, California, US
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    299
    There is a Rodagon WA 120mm wide angle lens for 4x5.
    There may be other wide angle lenses out there, but I do not know of them.
    The WA lens will give you a bigger image for a given enlarger height.
    So 120 biggest image, followed by 135, then 150 with smallest image.
    But the cost of the WA lens is much more than the standard 135 or 150.

    In my case, I have a 135mm lens for my Omega D5, rather than the 150mm lens.
    This is because the D5 has the shorter standard height column, vs the D5-XL with the taller column.

  3. #13
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    17,000
    Images
    148
    Quote Originally Posted by polyglot View Post
    I think you have a typo in here Ian, especially comparing 135 to 135 A 150mm will give a smaller enlargement than a 135mm.
    Yes I did mean the other way around 150mm gives significantly smaller enlargements than a 135mm at the same height.

    Ian
    Last edited by Ian Grant; 04-16-2013 at 04:03 AM. Click to view previous post history. Reason: lack of sleep

  4. #14

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    South Africa
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    460
    Images
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Grant View Post
    Yes I did mean the other way around 150mm gives significantly smaller enlargements than a 150mm at the same height.

    Ian
    Not your day, Ian? Sorry, see you edited before I posted. Lack of sleep? Blame APUG.

    The gain from 135 to 120 will be 12,5 %. So on linear dimension, it should enable one to change a 16" x 20" image to 18" by 22,5", for example. From 150 to 135, the change is slightly less, but it may be such that one can fit in a paper one size larger that isn't possible with the longer lens. If you use WA lenses, make sure that your bellows assembly contracts short enough to attain focus at all column settings. I cannot for instance use a 40 mm lens for 35 mm on my Durst M605. Although I have no idea, it may be possible that some 4x5 enlargers do not allow for such short lenses to be used, unless they were designed for all image sizes down to 35 mm, or at least one or two formats down.
    Last edited by dorff; 04-16-2013 at 04:26 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  5. #15
    paul_c5x4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ye Olde England
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,800
    Images
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by dorff View Post
    If you use WA lenses, make sure that your bellows assembly contracts short enough to attain focus at all column settings. I cannot for instance use a 40 mm lens for 35 mm on my Durst M605. Although I have no idea, it may be possible that some 4x5 enlargers do not allow for such short lenses to be used, unless they were designed for all image sizes down to 35 mm, or at least one or two formats down.
    Durst do recessed lens boards, the two I have to hand, one measures 15mm deep, the other, 35mm deep. The downside with recessed boards is being able to adjust the aperture and/or see the scale.

  6. #16

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Aurora, IL
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,131
    Quote Originally Posted by superd View Post
    Unlike camera lenses, where choice of focal lengths is substantial for any given negative size, you're quite limited in the darkroom. You can go longer, but hardly shorter on focal lengths for a given negative. I don't know of any enlarging lenses for 4x5 below 135 (although I would not be surprised if there are some with satisfactory coverage), which as stated already is going to give you the largest print size for same elevation.
    I think due to the requirement of flat field, very high in sharpness and especially distortion free it would be very difficult to make a wide angle enlarging lens.

  7. #17

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    SF Bay Area, California, US
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    299
    Quote Originally Posted by Chan Tran View Post
    I think due to the requirement of flat field, very high in sharpness and especially distortion free it would be very difficult to make a wide angle enlarging lens.
    That is why the WA enlarging lenses cost so much more.
    And that is why I bought the 135 rather than the more expensive 120mm lens.

  8. #18
    Mainecoonmaniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,575
    Images
    6

    Do they still make 5x4 film?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Grant View Post
    He's talking LF 5"x4"

    A 135mm is a nexcellent choice, I've made large prints with Compono/Componn S lenses with no issues, They are designed for the format.

    Ian
    5x4 film sounds like a larger format than 4x5 I guess it depends if you shoot landscape or portrait.
    “We are buried beneath the weight of information, which is being confused with knowledge; quantity is being confused with abundance and wealth with happiness.
    We are monkeys with money and guns.”

    ― Tom Waits

  9. #19
    paulgallinule's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Portarlington, Co Laois, Ireland
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    115
    Images
    96
    Hi everyone

    Thank you so much for the help, looks like the 135 for me, not sure I could stretch to the 120WA,

    Hope to post a few image from the 5x4 soon,

    Paul
    A painter interprets an image, a film photographer captures an image and a digital photographer creates an image.

  10. #20
    M Carter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    634
    I removed the column from my 6x7 enlarger and mounted it to a sturdy plywood cube, which has a wider base than the top and sides. The base has 1/4" holes on each side, and the edge of my worktable has 1/4-20 threaded nuts in the surface (T-nuts). When I want to print big, I mount the cube to the edge of the table using 1/4-20 thumb screws and put my easel on the floor. For normal printing, there's a set of holes at the back of the table.

    A cool thing about this setup is that it's easy to fine-tune the level of the enlarger; I can loosen one corner and slide a shim beneath it and re-tighten. Works like a champ.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin