Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,488   Posts: 1,571,326   Online: 814
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    67
    Images
    12

    Film processing: Agitation by pumping?

    Hi.

    I have been thinking about building a home made automated film (b&w) processor - load the film, start the processor and forget the whole thing for a while Manual film processing isn't that much fun, consistency could probably be improved, and not least: it seems like a fun project. Some way of agitating the film will obviously be required, but the big question is how. Among others, a rotary processor is a possibility and mechanical inversion of a daylight tank should be possible... But what about using a circulating pump? Drain fluid from the bottom of the tank, feed it through the pump and return it at the top of the tank. Or place an impeller (more or less a propeller) at the bottom of the tank. A somewhat modified standard tank such as a Paterson could be used. Agitation (ie. pumping) frequency and duration can easily be controlled, and the system would contain no moving parts (well, the pump obviously has moving parts, but consider it a readily made black box for this purpose). Add a handful of valves for filling and draining the various liquids, and the device should be complete.

    Any comments on the principle of using a circulating pump for agitation?

    Knut

  2. #2
    FrankB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Northwest UK
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,147
    Images
    24
    Can't really help on the pumping approach but would love to hear how you get on.

    Thought you might be interested in this link, though (for ideas if nothing else) - http://www.rhdesigns.co.uk/darkroom/...processor.html
    The destination is important, but so is the journey

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    371
    Images
    15
    You either want consistency (provided by a rotary processor), or consistency (provided by irregular inversion).

    A pump provides nothing but irregularity unless the film is also in motion.

    Graham.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    67
    Images
    12
    Thanks for the link FrankB. I've seen ads for this processor, but could not remember who makes it. Interesting with a more detailed description of the design. Such an approach may very well be the safest, as it resembles very closely the usual manual agitation. It should also be possible to make a similar processor with automatic filling and draining. Among others, a modified tank cap would be required. Definately something to consider.

    But the pumping concept has a number of advantages, as the thing should be homebuilt with relatively inexpensive (as always) off the shelf parts.

    Knut

  5. #5
    Bosaiya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sumner, Washington
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    400
    One thing I've thought about is modifying automated egg-turners. These are devices that sit inside an incubator and rock the eggs back and forth. Most have some adjustment of timing possible, and most will rock to one side a bit, wait a little, rock to the other side, wait a little, and repeat. They're very inexpensive.

    The problem as I see it is that the whole tray doesn't rock, just individual rows, but perhaps that would be part of the modification process.

  6. #6
    Michel Hardy-Vallée's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Montréal (QC)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,351
    Images
    132
    In light of the problem of designing an automated film processor, are there any processors on the market that can do agitation by inversion? I don't know, something like a paint mixer, but with a slightly irregular and intermittent pattern of agitation.

  7. #7
    Baxter Bradford's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Lymington, South Coast, UK
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    772
    Images
    102
    I have just constructed a tank for supplying water at 38 deg C for E6 to my Jobo. To circulate the water around the heating element for a uniform temp, I have used a 320l-hr mains operated pump for an aquarium. This is pretty small and quiet and ought to do the job.

    Not sure how much automation you require, but......

    To pump the water into the Jobo on demand, I am using a 12V submersible Whale pump from a camping shop which has proved effective. This (or even these if you get very ambitious!) might be employed to pump chemicals into the tank, but would need a timer to get correct amount of solution.

    Like Graham, my instinct is to have concerns about how uniform the agitation would be...... but I wish you luck and please keep us posted.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    67
    Images
    12
    Egg-turners - cool idea..!.. Didn't think of that one - maybe because i didn't know that such animals actually exist

    mhv: Check out the link provided by FrankB.

    gbroadbridge: The general idea is to provide motion of the film relative to the developer, isn't it? What's the principal difference between moving the film (such as using film hangers in deep tanks) and moving the developer liquid by circulating it? In practice there are a number of challenges of course; such as providing a reasonably even flow distribution over the entire film area. Particularly for a spiral reel a la Paterson, this can very well be a problem, or maybe a show-stopper. I guess flow rate and pump pressure would be quite important parameters. A quick google search for (film agitation, pumping) gives several hits, but as far as I can see, these are about rather big automated processors.

    Knut

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    6,242
    The problem that exists in pumping developer over the surface of film is that the laminar flow must be absolutely even or uneven development will result. Even a design with a manifold incorporating precisely drilled orifices will result in some uneveness because there will be a pressure differential and differing flow characteristics from the inlet to the terminus of the manifold.

    Stop and fixer would not be so critical.

    If I were going to design something of this type, I would probably look at a design incorporating agitation rather then pumped chemical flow. If I were to get so involved as to incorporate replenishment or dump and fill, I would look to peristaltic type pumps for their precision in volumetric delivery.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    6,242
    Quote Originally Posted by mhv
    In light of the problem of designing an automated film processor, are there any processors on the market that can do agitation by inversion? I don't know, something like a paint mixer, but with a slightly irregular and intermittent pattern of agitation.

    Jobo has a reputation for very even film development. Why reinvent the wheel? If someone wants to build something themselves, copy from their operating characteristics. That can be done without infringing on their patent rights.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin