Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,970   Posts: 1,523,532   Online: 851
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    248

    Need Advice on both 8x10 enlarging lens and 8x10 WA lens.

    Hello my fellow APUGrs. I am very happy to announce my purchase (I just sent out the check in today's mail) of a beseler mcrx/aristo rt-12 coldlight 8x10 enlarger! I'm going to be selling my practically new saunders 4550XLG and all of my 4x5 gear and do NOTHING BUT 8x10! Yeah Baby! No I'm not TOO excited. :-)

    I would like any input on an enlarging lens (240) for that puppy. Also, I'm in the market for a wide angle lens for my 8x10 camera 150-180. Any suggestions would be appreciated.

    Thanks
    Bob

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Boise, ID
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    460
    Images
    2
    159mm Wolly is a nice 8x10 wide angle (21mm equalivant in 35mm) I picked up mine for under $200 on ebay.
    The soul never thinks without an image.
    - Aristotle

  3. #3
    Jeremy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Denton, TX
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,767
    Images
    56
    I'm a fan of the 6.5" WA Dagor. Mine is mounted in an Ilex #3 and is fantastic!
    Let's see what I've got in the magic trash can for Mateo!

    blog
    website

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    6,242
    I have the 240 Componon S. I imagine that any of the major lens manufacturers will be capable of providing good glass. I have both Rodenstock Rodagon and Nikon El Nikkor in 150mm and they are both good lenses.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Tijeras, NM
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,246
    apo-nikkor
    good enough for AA
    art is about managing compromise

  6. #6
    df cardwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Dearborn,Michigan & Cape Breton Island
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,342
    Images
    8
    Hey Bob

    Way to go. You'll find it EASIER than 4x5. Don't forget a big darkcloth, so you can get back from the glass !

    1. I use a 240 EL Nikkor. Fantastic. The only drawback with the Nikkor ( on the same enlarger you have ) is mounting plate on the enlarger had to be cut away to make room: the lens has a very great diameter. A new Rodenstock would be great as well, and I'm sure an Apo Nikkor or Konica/Kowa repro lense would be fine as well.

    2. Lots of folks have used the 159 Wolly, but that was only an OK lens a long time ago. The 150 SW Nikkor is an absolute joy to use. I was MORE than delighted in my commercial days with the Nikkor ( today, I just make muddy little contact sheets with my protars ). It is VERY easy to use, the image seeming to be lasered into the ground glass.

    Have a GOOD time.

    .
    "One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid,
    and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"

    -Bertrand Russell

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,576
    Images
    27
    Just want to say Thank You Bob, because I have been wondering the same thing. Since the 8x10 that I have came with a older Regno Shutter (Wollensak) and lens cells (Series III) that seem to be around 6 3/4 in and 8 1/2 in. But the shutter has started to get quite stubborn, was thinking about replacing the set-up with something a little more modern (the set up seems to be about 80-95 y/o so guess it is allowed )
    Mike C

    Rambles

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    324
    Images
    1
    I have a couple 240mm rodagons that I like and believe to produce very nice prints.

    However, I also have a 240 el nikkor which I prefer to the rodagons.

    All the lenses are modern and in good shape, but for some reason I believe the nikkor is sharper.. however it is a bit bigger than the rodagons.

    One thing to consider is that the nikkor does not have click stops on the apeture, while the Rodagon Does. The no click stops is sometimes really nice, but sometimes I'd perfer the solid clicks on the apeture.

    FWIW,

    Corey

  9. #9
    Bob Carnie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Toronto-Ontario
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    4,625
    Images
    14
    Hi Bob

    I would not want to sour the day but if you are anal about edge to edge coverage and like seeing your black rebates , I would suggest getting a 300mm rodagon or if you have enlarger height a 360mm.
    I know the 240 will work but your coverage will be better with the longer lens. Just my 2cents.


    Bob

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    248
    Bob, is there obvious falloff with the 240? I hope not because I believe the 240 is the longest I can go on the beseler mcrx conversion.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin